Davis may play against Richmond

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cruiser
    What the frack!
    • Jul 2004
    • 6114

    Davis may play against Richmond

    Promising news. Given MOL's erratic form and ROK's inaccuracy, we need Nick back ASAP.

    Occupational hazards:
    I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
    - animal psychic Amanda de Warren
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #2
    Re: Davis may play against Richmond

    Originally posted by cruiser
    Promising news. Given MOL's erratic form and ROK's inaccuracy, we need Nick back ASAP.

    http://sydneyswans.com.au/default.as...ticleid=264368
    I just hope that they aren't rushing him in to soon and that the hammy holds up ok.
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • Nico
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 11339

      #3
      Rushed him back last year with disastrous effects.

      I think we need to get Mathews back to improve our handball and kicking accuracy. Did anyone miss him last week?
      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

      Comment

      • Nico
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 11339

        #4
        Why dont we rush Bevo back to give us some more positive ball use in the midfield.
        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #5
          Originally posted by Nico
          Rushed him back last year with disastrous effects.

          I think we need to get Mathews back to improve our handball and kicking accuracy. Did anyone miss him last week?
          Did anyone miss who?
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • Carolyn
            Randomness muchly
            • Feb 2006
            • 986

            #6
            The big question is: With Nick Davis in, who is out?
            My Pokemon brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "Wanna trade cards?"
            "Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              #7
              "...some areas to improve..." - such as accuracy!!
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • stellation
                scott names the planets
                • Sep 2003
                • 9721

                #8
                Excitement factor=high!
                I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                Comment

                • BarneyG
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 161

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Carolyn
                  The big question is: With Nick Davis in, who is out?
                  My guess would be McVeigh

                  Comment

                  • Ruckman
                    Ego alta, ergo ictus
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 3990

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Carolyn
                    The big question is: With Nick Davis in, who is out?
                    Tricky, those who are performing weekest like Richards and Chambers will certainly be needed against Richmonds height.
                    And Fosdike & Ablett improved last week, while Monty, MOL & Schneider while quiet last week were good the week before.

                    I'm afraid it'll be a youngster, leither McVeigh, Dempster or the Eski. They've done nothing wrong so it's a very tough break.

                    Comment

                    • Sanecow
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 6917

                      #11
                      We need to read this.

                      Comment

                      • hammo
                        Veterans List
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 5554

                        #12
                        Gee, people on here were saying last week was McVeigh's best game for the club. It would be harsh to drop him now.

                        I'd like to see him have an extended run in the team to get his confidence up.

                        I'm afraid its Dempster to go for me.
                        "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                        Comment

                        • Ruckman
                          Ego alta, ergo ictus
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 3990

                          #13
                          Originally posted by hammo
                          I'm afraid its Dempster to go for me.
                          I think probably McVeigh but can you imagine Nicks face if Roosy said he needed a run in 2's
                          Last edited by Ruck'n'Roll; 10 May 2006, 12:36 PM.

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #14
                            Seems a bit quick. Why not wait an extra week or two.
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • Matt79
                              Bring it on!
                              • Sep 2004
                              • 3143

                              #15
                              Originally posted by NMWBloods
                              Seems a bit quick. Why not wait an extra week or two.
                              I agree, give him 1 more week on the side lines.
                              Swannies for life!

                              Comment

                              Working...