If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Why not just limit the number of interchange players?
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
they have not resulted in the game being played at a slower pace and in a more contested style - as favoured by league chief executive Andrew Demetriou and the AFL commission.
How about letting players contest the footy without blowing the freaking whistle every time there's physical contact in a marking or ruck contest?
Originally posted by goswannie14 I don't get it, have the quick kick in to speed the game up...then limit the interchanges to slow the game down.
Excuse the French, but WTF are these idiots on.
What GS14 said.. again. I think I'll just let you do all my football posting for me from now on Vic.
Occupational hazards:
I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
I heard a report about this on Radio National tonight. They interviewed the journalist Gideon Haigh who referred to the quick kick in and the effect it was having on players. He quoted a player, I think it was Richardson from last week who said how exhausted everybody was and that was given as an explanation for a large number of behinds being scored. As an aside Gideon also mentioned that the time you used to get after a behind gave the players a chance to catch their breath and the spectators to talk about the game without the frenetic pace. Obviously food for thought.
Comment