A quote from this week's AFL Record:
"Research shows the average AFL career starts at age 18 and lasts about four years."
Roos and his little helpers (and large in the case of Horse) seem to do it differently. Is this because they are aware of the research (the article doesn't give any source) or have they worked it out for themselves?
Their method seems to be to hold youngsters back a while generally speaking (Schneider was an exception I think) so that they arrive in the firsts a bit later than kids in most other teams. When they hit the big time they seem to be ready for it - Malceski is probably the outstanding example, but we are also getting good value out of McVeigh lately. And maybe as a result they will last longer and deliver more. The pity is that the AFL rookie system forces us to turn them over fairly quickly on the average, although a club can always make room for late developing talent by recycling them through the draft, e.g. Kirk.
Thoughts, people?
"Research shows the average AFL career starts at age 18 and lasts about four years."
Roos and his little helpers (and large in the case of Horse) seem to do it differently. Is this because they are aware of the research (the article doesn't give any source) or have they worked it out for themselves?
Their method seems to be to hold youngsters back a while generally speaking (Schneider was an exception I think) so that they arrive in the firsts a bit later than kids in most other teams. When they hit the big time they seem to be ready for it - Malceski is probably the outstanding example, but we are also getting good value out of McVeigh lately. And maybe as a result they will last longer and deliver more. The pity is that the AFL rookie system forces us to turn them over fairly quickly on the average, although a club can always make room for late developing talent by recycling them through the draft, e.g. Kirk.
Thoughts, people?

)
Comment