About a "no-@@@@head" policy and where it's coming from

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swansrock4eva
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 1352

    #16
    The way the league guys keep going you don't have to try to hard to outshine them!

    Comment

    • wheels27
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2005
      • 397

      #17
      I reckon player behaviour is a by-product of how they are treated in the public domain, hence AFL "heroes" in Melbourne or NRL "heroes" in Sydney get a bit big for their boots. Yet swans players (who?... Oh,yeah I think they won the GayFL or something in Victoria...snigger, snigger) would tend to be a bit more humble and less conspicuous if they can help it.

      Enough people tell a young bloke how great he is, he's bound to show signs of @@@@headedness (is this a word) eventually.
      I hear not what you say, for the thunder of who you are.

      Comment

      • giant
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2005
        • 4731

        #18
        Originally posted by swansrock4eva
        Cage em up at a camp for a week and see how they go! Veeery quickly sorts them out!
        Worked a treat at Guantanomo Bay.

        Comment

        • cruiser
          What the frack!
          • Jul 2004
          • 6114

          #19
          Originally posted by NMWBloods
          I think some RWOers base their entire views of recruiting on the dhead factor first and foremost, and most of this is based on whether they like the player or not, whereas I think the club looks at a lot more, and the dhead policy is just one thing, and it's not as straight forward as 'is he a dhead or not'.
          And your agenda here is recruiting Akermanis?
          Occupational hazards:
          I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
          - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            #20
            Originally posted by cruiser
            And your agenda here is recruiting Akermanis?
            At the right price Akermanis would be a great recruit for us.
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            • The Big Cat
              On the veteran's list
              • Apr 2006
              • 2360

              #21
              Originally posted by giant
              Worked a treat at Guantanomo Bay.
              No Hickshead policy?
              Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

              Comment

              • giant
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2005
                • 4731

                #22
                Originally posted by The Big Cat
                No Hickshead policy?
                Pay that.

                Comment

                • graystar
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 543

                  #23
                  The way spider everitt carried on this week I would hope he would never come to the swans.
                  I will be a member again when I return.

                  Comment

                  • Missy
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 445

                    #24
                    What constitutes a @@@@head anyway? The list is endless.

                    A friend of mine met one of the younger swans at a club a couple of months ago. Shes not an AFL supporter and had no idea who he was. They hung out for a couple of weeks after that but the way he treated her was appaulling! Total and utter @@@@head, but certainly does not affect what a great player he is on the field and how he bonds within the team.

                    I wonder what the club preaches to the players in that respect?

                    Comment

                    • wheels27
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 397

                      #25
                      This is the exact problem with thinking the club has a no @@@@heads policy.

                      Every single bloke in existence would no doubt have at least one person who thinks they are a @@@@head, as you say, this doesn't affect their place in a footy team.
                      I hear not what you say, for the thunder of who you are.

                      Comment

                      • katie-scarlett
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 515

                        #26
                        Perhaps the rule applies to @@@@headisms on field & as a media personality (i.e. on behalf of the club).
                        Their personal lives = irrelevant?

                        Comment

                        • giant
                          Veterans List
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 4731

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Missy
                          What constitutes a @@@@head anyway? The list is endless.

                          A friend of mine met one of the younger swans at a club a couple of months ago. Shes not an AFL supporter and had no idea who he was. They hung out for a couple of weeks after that but the way he treated her was appaulling! Total and utter @@@@head, but certainly does not affect what a great player he is on the field and how he bonds within the team.

                          I wonder what the club preaches to the players in that respect?
                          But..no...wait...our angels don't go to clubs. And if they did they wouldn't pick up girls. And if they did they'd act like total gentlemen. Must have been a case of mistaken identity with one of those nasty league types.

                          Comment

                          • katie-scarlett
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 515

                            #28
                            I don't think her point was that the Swans are 'angels'.

                            Total and utter @@@@head, but certainly does not affect what a great player he is on the field and how he bonds within the team.
                            I think her point is somewhere in those lines.

                            Comment

                            • wheels27
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 397

                              #29
                              I would guess that he must have waited a while to reveal true @@@@headism, as you mentioned they hung out for a couple of weeks.

                              So, at least initially, his @@@@headism musn't have been obvious, or is your friend a glutton for punishment?

                              (I also like saying "@@@@headism" - what a word!)
                              I hear not what you say, for the thunder of who you are.

                              Comment

                              • katie-scarlett
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Dec 2005
                                • 515

                                #30
                                Originally posted by wheels27

                                (I also like saying "@@@@headism" - what a word!)
                                haha indeed!

                                Comment

                                Working...