Importance of Willo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #16
    Originally posted by j s
    The real reason Willo didn't play.....

    Roosy didn't want him suspended for taking revenge for last years king-hit by Brady Rawlings.
    Nah, he used up all his angry pills last week.

    Comment

    • TheHood
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 1938

      #17
      Originally posted by ScottH
      Fossie needs to learn to count while running.
      Don't often get 2 holding the ball against a team in the one game. It was undisciplined but it was also a result of numbers the Roos had behind the ball.
      The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #18
        Originally posted by TheHood
        Don't often get 2 holding the ball against a team in the one game. It was undisciplined but it was also a result of numbers the Roos had behind the ball.
        Yeh, but!! He was so far in the clear he could've stopped and placed the ball on the ground, and perform a handstand, and a backflip with a double pike and still picked up the ball and run a bit more.

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16818

          #19
          Could well be Malceski the team missed too. He didn't play the first two games, came in for the Carlton win, did play in the Dees loss (though could have drawn it himself) and then has been playing well until getting injured early last week. Although we beat the Hawks comfortably, I didn't think the team performed that well.

          I know it's a bit early to be claiming him as an essential part of the team but the evidence supports it this season!

          Comment

          Working...