Sin Bin in AFL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Irish_33
    On the Rookie List
    • Feb 2006
    • 44

    #16
    Perfect example of why players should be marched.
    www.achtungbaby.com.au

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #17
      Originally posted by Irish_33
      Perfect example of why players should be marched.
      He was just saying goodbye, and keep in touch.

      Comment

      • Sanecow
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2003
        • 6917

        #18
        He never connected anyway; it's just mucking around.

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #19
          Originally posted by wheels27
          Personally agree with you, but, to play devil's advocate, if a player does something so obvious and bad that an umpire (a) sees it, and (b) deems it worthy of send off, why shouldn't the team he is playing at the time be 'compensated' (for want of a better term), rather than giving the advantage from his actions to another opponent next week.

          I also agree that a man down advantage is bigger in AFL than some other games (otherwise Holland would have beaten us by 10 goals the other night.)

          Maybe a send off or sin bin with replacement allowed, but the offender can not return (leaving a 3-man bench)

          As an aside, does anyone know of a football league anywhere else that has the send-off rule? (other than SydneyAFL)
          They used to have it in the VFA (now called VFL), but it was chnaged after Phil Cleary was sent off for Coburg in a final, they lost the game and the chanrge was dismissed at the tribunal.
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • floppinab
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 1681

            #20
            Originally posted by goswannie14
            They used to have it in the VFA (now called VFL), but it was chnaged after Phil Cleary was sent off for Coburg in a final, they lost the game and the chanrge was dismissed at the tribunal.
            Most leagues a step down from the major state leagues, and that includes most junior leagues have a send off rule. It almost seems a bit of an anachranism that our major leagues don't have it.

            Comment

            • RogueSwan
              McVeigh for Brownlow
              • Apr 2003
              • 4602

              #21
              Originally posted by Sanecow
              Difficult question. On the one hand I hate to break with the tradition of the report and suspension but on the other it bugs the crap out of me that the team(s) that next play your opponent get the advantage of the suspension while you get a king-hit player for the game in which the incident occurred.
              Got to agree with that sentiment. What if that Gorilla Gehrig monstered Leapin' this week. Why should the Camry's get the benefit of not playing against him while this week we have a concussed Leo on the bench?
              Currently the situation only penalises the team with the culprit, without compensating the team with the victim.
              But then again, what goes around, comes around, karma, kismet .....
              "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

              Comment

              • swantastic
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2006
                • 7275

                #22
                SAY NO TO SIN BINS.
                Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                Comment

                Working...