If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by redunderthebed if that useless piece of untalented rubbish had been playing we would have lost by 200 points.
All you experts know this.
Mathews didn't actually do anything to make us lose so you can't really blame him for tonight's loss...
My Pokemon brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "Wanna trade cards?"
"Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"
Originally posted by Nico Can see the headlines on Thursday night "Mathews rushed back".
Yes Mathews could start playing a week before everyone else and still wouldn't know what to do with the ball.
"As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Originally posted by monopoly19 I reckon he would have actually been useful tonight. We needed someone who could make some tackles stick.
I was actually thinking the same thing during the game. Given that a wet game is often about belting the ball forward and not thinking too much about precision play, he may have been more useful than some of our players in this area.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
Originally posted by NMWBloods I was actually thinking the same thing during the game. Given that a wet game is often about belting the ball forward and not thinking too much about precision play, he may have been more useful than some of our players in this area.
Originally posted by Carolyn Mathews didn't actually do anything to make us lose so you can't really blame him for tonight's loss...
Amazing,i was trying to be ironic.Of course Benny would have been a welcome addition to last nights team and,possibly, been a three point difference.
But don't ever admit to recognising any of Ben's ability on this forum or you will be carved up by the usual brigade of headhunters.
Originally posted by redunderthebed But don't ever admit to recognising any of Ben's ability on this forum or you will be carved up by the usual brigade of headhunters.
Well said. Finally some balance to the Mathews debate.
Every Swans (and AFL!) player playing today has ability; if they didn't, they wouldn't find themselves on a current senior list. Of course some have more ability than others, but it's still worth remembering why they're on the team to start with.
This doesn't mean people aren't allowed to criticize players after a poor performance, but on the flip side if the same player does have certain strengths, it's important to acknowledge this too. I don't know how many players from the club read RWO, maybe it doesn't make a difference, but it doesn't hurt to be positive when it's warranted.
I think Ben has a place in our first 22, I don't think it is ideally in our midfield but he deserves a spot in a pocket . I think it is Roos' use of Ben that causes the heartache more than Ben himself.
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
Originally posted by stellation I think Ben has a place in our first 22, I don't think it is ideally in our midfield but he deserves a spot in a pocket . I think it is Roos' use of Ben that causes the heartache more than Ben himself.
"A spot in a pocket" doesn't really mean much nowadays though. He can't play on a tall forward and most smaller forwards are really quick - which Mathews isn't. He certainly still has a role to play but I think it is more likely to be in the middle part of the ground, playing on a clever but not overly quick player, ala Ball, Grant, Hodge.
And, indeed, this is a role he has performed consistently well over the years.
I didn't particuarly mean just in the backline, he is pretty decent around goals too. I think the problem with him in the midfield is that is just clugs it up with one more defensive player.
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
Comment