If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by swantastic Tell us some thing we dont know,we all knew that was coming.
Swantastic, how did you know that Aker would be voted out 12-0? You say we all knew that was coming. I didn't even know they were going to vote on the matter, particularly during July.
Check the date of the previous post before replying.
And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .
Originally posted by Claret Swantastic, how did you know that Aker would be voted out 12-0? You say we all knew that was coming. I didn't even know they were going to vote on the matter, particularly during July.
Check the date of the previous post before replying.
I never said that I knew the result of 12-0,what i said was i knew Aker would not play for lions again,i was just stating the bleeding obvious. And i did check the DATE.
Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...
Originally posted by swantastic I never said that I knew the result of 12-0,what i said was i knew Aker would not play for lions again,i was just stating the bleeding obvious. And i did check the DATE.
Then if you didn't know the result of the vote (which, by the way, was the MAIN point of the article - NOT the fact that Aker won't play there again) why did you accuse Scott of posting something you already had prior knowledge of??
Yes, it became blatantly obvious that Akermanis would not play for the Lions next year some time ago HOWEVER . . . . the article outlined the fact that the leadership group, combined with the Match Committee, rejected a request by Aker to come back and play out the remainder of the season.
And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .
Originally posted by Claret Then if you didn't know the result of the vote (which, by the way, was the MAIN point of the article - NOT the fact that Aker won't play there again) why did you accuse Scott of posting something you already had prior knowledge of??
Yes, it became blatantly obvious that Akermanis would not play for the Lions next year some time ago HOWEVER . . . . the article outlined the fact that the leadership group, combined with the Match Committee, rejected a request by Aker to come back and play out the remainder of the season.
I think you should get your facts right claret,i didnt accuse him of any thing and who cares if i did/or didnt have prior knowledge of the vote scott can post what ever he likes, i was just giving IMO.What with all the trouble up there you could see that coming a mile away.The story Scott refered to was dated 27/7/2006 and posted on the same day,today is the 1/8/2006 so there for i would/could know the result since it was 4 days ago.By the way who cares if you didnt know they were going to vote,what you think they should ask you permission.They droped him after a blinder of a game because of comments,and you didnt see it coming,wake up and smell the roses.
Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...
Comment