Interesting decision re: well known AFL drug users

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sanecow
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Mar 2003
    • 6917

    Interesting decision re: well known AFL drug users

    In handing down the decision Justice Murray Kellam said the media's case for publishing the names had been based on three key points.

    These were that firstly the players' names were no longer confidential and were already in the public domain, that the players had been involved in criminal conduct by taking illicit drugs and therefore had no right to confidentiality and thirdly that public interest required that the names of the players be revealed.

    However Justice Kellam dismissed all three points in upholding the AFL and the AFLPA's right to keep the players' names suppressed.

    "Firstly there is no evidence that the names of the players have gone to the public at large through newspapers or television or any mass media outlet," he said, adding the only evidence that the players' names were already widely available in public was through some internet chat rooms.
    Source

    Does this ruling mean that "internet chat rooms" do not constitute "the public domain"? So therefore, we can discuss the identities of the people in question "in private" here on RWO? It sets an interesting precedent should an Internet forum get taken to court in the future!
  • Frog
    Retired from RWO
    • Aug 2005
    • 1898

    #2
    Re: Interesting decision re: well known AFL drug users

    Originally posted by Sanecow
    Source

    Does this ruling mean that "internet chat rooms" do not constitute "the public domain"? So therefore, we can discuss the identities of the people in question "in private" here on RWO? It sets an interesting precedent should an Internet forum get taken to court in the future!
    Thanks Cow - But could we please exercise a bit of constraint and make sure that RWO is not the internet forum to test such a case ?

    Comment

    • Sanecow
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Mar 2003
      • 6917

      #3
      Sure, let Big Footy go first.

      Comment

      • goswannie14
        Leadership Group
        • Sep 2005
        • 11166

        #4
        Originally posted by Sanecow
        Sure, let Big Footy go first.
        Then everyone will think it's BS anyway.
        Does God believe in Atheists?

        Comment

        • ugg
          Can you feel it?
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 15961

          #5
          We could always mask their identities with really abstract nicknames so that no one could definitely say who the player is.
          Reserves live updates (Twitter)
          Reserves WIKI -
          Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

          Comment

          • goswannie14
            Leadership Group
            • Sep 2005
            • 11166

            #6
            Originally posted by ugg
            We could always mask their identities with really abstract nicknames so that no one could definitely say who the player is.
            That's become popular on here recently.
            Does God believe in Atheists?

            Comment

            • swantastic
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2006
              • 7275

              #7
              Originally posted by ugg
              We could always mask their identities with really abstract nicknames so that no one could definitely say who the player is.
              Ask Marry Me Goodes,seems to think he/she makes up funny nick names for people that nobody can under stand.
              Last edited by swantastic; 30 August 2006, 07:53 PM.
              Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #8
                Andy D reckons he doesn't even know who they are.

                Adrian A reckons that who the public know is just rumour and hearsay.

                So who the bloody hell in the AFL does know?

                Comment

                Working...