Worsfold to copy Roos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ugg
    Can you feel it?
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 15970

    Worsfold to copy Roos

    Eagles attack to counter Goodes
    Rather than using a tagger to negate Goodes, who is in career-best form, Worsfold may take a leaf out of the book of his counterpart this weekend, Paul Roos, by assigning an attacking player to the 2003 Brownlow medallist in Saturday night's qualifying final.
    Get your own ideas John!
    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
    Reserves WIKI -
    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters
  • 573v30
    On the bandwagon...
    • Sep 2005
    • 5017

    #2
    Woosha is already @@@@ting in his pants...
    I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

    Comment

    • goswannie14
      Leadership Group
      • Sep 2005
      • 11166

      #3
      I heard he was going to play Judd on Goodes.
      Does God believe in Atheists?

      Comment

      • Slick Swans
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2003
        • 207

        #4
        Originally posted by goswannie14
        I heard he was going to play Judd on Goodes.
        It happened for a brief period last time they played.
        "Red and White for blood cells, Red and White for wine."
        "They could be the whole damn spectrum, if you just damn let them"

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #5
          Goodsey's gunna run rings around them and they're already shaking their heads in disbelief.
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • nomae
            Regular in the Side
            • May 2006
            • 523

            #6
            Rather than using a tagger to negate Goodes, who is in career-best form, Worsfold may take a leaf out of the book of his counterpart this weekend, Paul Roos, by assigning an attacking player to the 2003 Brownlow medallist in Saturday night's qualifying final.

            shouldnt that say 2003 + 2006 brownlow medallist?

            Comment

            • Zlatorog
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2006
              • 1748

              #7
              Originally posted by Annie's@Home
              Goodsey's gunna run rings around them and they're already shaking their heads in disbelief.
              I just hope he'll be carefull. I don't want him to be taken out by some ill-mannered player at the beginning of the game. Mind my word he will be targeted.

              Comment

              • AnnieH
                RWOs Black Sheep
                • Aug 2006
                • 11332

                #8
                Originally posted by Zlatorog
                I just hope he'll be carefull. I don't want him to be taken out by some ill-mannered player at the beginning of the game. Mind my word he will be targeted.
                The Budgies can be dirty little so-and-so's.
                He better be bloody careful !!
                Roosey will look after him.
                Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                Comment

                • Zlatorog
                  Senior Player
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 1748

                  #9
                  It looks to me some of the WCE players can also play dirty. Here's what I've found on the Surf Coast Footy Chat about the prospects of WCE winning a flag:

                  Pros: You've got to respect a club with so much character, skill, tenacity and (alleged) gangland connections. Especially the (alleged) gangland connections. Cos if you don't, well... The Swan River is kind of deep and those concrete boots sure are heavy...

                  Cons: It's not just Sam Mitchell and Hawthorn supporters that still haven't forgiven Daniel Kerr for his nut-jobbing antics earlier in the season, it's every self-respecting man on the planet with a penis and matching sack set. I was doubled over in pain and had tears in my eyes for days after just watching it on the telly.

                  Link

                  So, Daniel, keep your hands off Adam's "family jewels".
                  Last edited by Zlatorog; 5 September 2006, 08:27 PM.

                  Comment

                  • AnnieH
                    RWOs Black Sheep
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 11332

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Zlatorog
                    Pros: You've got to respect a club with so much character, skill, tenacity and (alleged) gangland connections. Especially the (alleged) gangland connections. Cos if you don't, well... The Swan River is kind of deep and those concrete boots sure are heavy...

                    So, Daniel, keep your hands off Adam's "family jewels".
                    Otherwise you'll go for a swim in our "deeper" harbour and I'll supply two holden gearboxes for your floaties.
                    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                    Comment

                    • RogueSwan
                      McVeigh for Brownlow
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 4602

                      #11
                      I think the net result of the Weagles putting an attacking player on Goodes is going to be in our favour. Obviously (maybe not) we will try and shutdown their gun midfielders, otherwise Lynch will slaughter Leapin'. Therefore all the attacking players with the legs to match Goodes should already be taken. This leaves a non midfielder Wiggle free. Will this free Wiggle be as damaging as Goodes?
                      I don't think it is as simple as that, is it?
                      "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                      Comment

                      • TheHood
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 1938

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RogueSwan
                        I think the net result of the Weagles putting an attacking player on Goodes is going to be in our favour. Obviously (maybe not) we will try and shutdown their gun midfielders, otherwise Lynch will slaughter Leapin'. Therefore all the attacking players with the legs to match Goodes should already be taken. This leaves a non midfielder Wiggle free. Will this free Wiggle be as damaging as Goodes?
                        I don't think it is as simple as that, is it?
                        Personally I would start trying to put Stenglein on Goodesy, but that's just me.
                        The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

                        Comment

                        • AnnieH
                          RWOs Black Sheep
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 11332

                          #13
                          Originally posted by TheHood
                          Personally I would start trying to put Stenglein on Goodesy, but that's just me.
                          Trying Stenglein is a start.
                          Goodsey will just run rings.
                          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                          Comment

                          • Schneiderman
                            The Fourth Captain
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 1615

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TheHood
                            Personally I would start trying to put Stenglein on Goodesy, but that's just me.
                            Truth is, last year that worked because Goodes was less fit. This year.... ha ha ha haaaaa.

                            Noone but Judd can run with Goodes. And Goode marks better.

                            We'll see, but I reckon without Kerr or Embley, they are a few key players short.

                            A great opportunity for us to get them over there.
                            Our Greatest Moment:

                            Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

                            Comment

                            Working...