Chick Hunter

[woo]

whats with all these clowns haircuts as well?..they look like rats, and quite frankly to be honest, they are all pretty damn good lookin dudes

[Agent 86]

So I gather he's not well liked around here?

If his job is to get under people's skin I guess he's achieved it.

[Nolie]

Originally posted by Agent 86
So I gather he's not well liked around here?

If his job is to get under people's skin I guess he's achieved it.

His job is to play football - and he does not do that very well - not to get under opposition supporters' skins.

[dimelb]

Originally posted by punter257
yeah me too

up there with didak and camporeale for me

You can add Brodie Holland.

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by AussieAnge
Is that because of what he did to MOL whilst he was stretching and staging for the free?

The umpire was standing right there at the time and warned Hunter. Hunter continued bashing into Micky.
Had the bloody umpire done his job and pinged Hunter for interfering while the ball was NOT in play, that would've been another certain goal for Micky.

As to Daniel Chook ... he's already been suspended once this year. Maybe the tribunal will do the right thing and we don't see him again till next year.

That'll teach the dirty budgies a lesson.

[Mike_B]

Originally posted by Annie Haddad
As to Daniel Chook ... he's already been suspended once this year. Maybe the tribunal will do the right thing and we don't see him again till next year.

I took a look at the tribunal guidelines and points etc and IMHO Chick will either get 1 week or 2 as the offer - depending on whether they deem the impact medium or high. I reckon it will be graded reckless, in play, to the body. If its medium impact - it attracts 125 base points and 225 if deemed high impact (before loading for priors, deductions for early pleas).

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by Mike_B
I took a look at the tribunal guidelines and points etc and IMHO Chick will either get 1 week or 2 as the offer - depending on whether they deem the impact medium or high. I reckon it will be graded reckless, in play, to the body. If its medium impact - it attracts 125 base points and 225 if deemed high impact (before loading for priors, deductions for early pleas).

Stuff the points ... I say BRING BACK THE GOOD OLD DAYS.
Mooney would have gotten three months and Chook would have gotten a month. No questions asked.

[Agent 86]

Originally posted by Nolie
His job is to play football - and he does not do that very well - not to get under opposition supporters' skins.

True. But i'd prefer him continuing being a tosser as he's less valuable to them ('cos he's actually quite good) & helps to gee our players up. MOL was on fire.

[boroboy]

Hunter is a coward. Watch the Round 15 game when he's on Hall, and he doesn't say boo to him all night (which in all fairness is the intelligent thing to do).

But if you want to play footy like he did against MOL, then do it with everyone you play on, not just those you think you can 'bully'.

He's pathetic - the lowest of the low...

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by Mike_B
I took a look at the tribunal guidelines and points etc and IMHO Chick will either get 1 week or 2 as the offer - depending on whether they deem the impact medium or high. I reckon it will be graded reckless, in play, to the body. If its medium impact - it attracts 125 base points and 225 if deemed high impact (before loading for priors, deductions for early pleas).

I would beg to differ from you on one thing, looking at the head on replay, it is obvious that Chick changes direction to run at Malceski after he kicks the ball, which would suggest that it should be deemed deliberate. But who knows with this system, he might even get off!

Even a good mate of mine who is a WCE supporter said to me last night that when he saw it on tape he thought it was deliderate and that Chick is goooooorn.

[Jeffers1984]

I think they'll offer hime 1, they will appeal and he will get off.

[Agent 86]

Originally posted by goswannie14
But who knows with this system, he might even get off!

Spot on there. Anything could happen. At least if he gets off they might stop whinging about Baz getting off last year (but i doubt it).

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by Dr Diabolical
Handballs actually, but anyway, I also think Chick deliberately sped up just as Malceski disposed of the ball. Should be deemed intentional.

It WAS totally intentional as he changed the direction he was running to belt out a cheap shot.

I'm SCREAMING for a return of the old-day tribunal.

One month - no questions asked.

[Mike_B]

Originally posted by goswannie14
I would beg to differ from you on one thing, looking at the head on replay, it is obvious that Chick changes direction to run at Malceski after he kicks the ball, which would suggest that it should be deemed deliberate. But who knows with this system, he might even get off!

I agree that he changed direction after Mal disposed of the ball, but if you read the description of intentional in the tribunal guidelines, I just don't think they will grade it intentional.


Tribunal Guidelines

[W84]

Hi! If the tribunal see this, your man MOL may be out for a week or two.

Eye-gouge on Hunter...