Swans 1996 vs Swans 2006

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bloody Hell
    Senior Player
    • Oct 2006
    • 3085

    Swans 1996 vs Swans 2006

    Seems to be the in thing at the moment...comparing great teams of different eras within a club....

    So who is better? Both teams played in losing GF's, both had a great FF and a great FB, both had good midfields (for different reasons) - Who would win?

    And who would shut down Plugger?
    Last edited by Bloody Hell; 15 October 2006, 12:04 AM.
    The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.
  • nomae
    Regular in the Side
    • May 2006
    • 523

    #2
    good question.
    for plugger... b2? dont reckon leo would have the strength to go with him.
    and who would win? i wasnt really a fan in 96 so ill have to say the 06 team. it would be a cracker of a match
    Last edited by nomae; 15 October 2006, 12:04 PM.

    Comment

    • punter257
      Deadliest Left Boot
      • Aug 2004
      • 1660

      #3
      LRT on luffy would be worth the admission price alone
      Roosy = LEGEND

      Comment

      • DeadlyAkkuret
        Veterans List
        • Oct 2006
        • 4547

        #4
        Dunks was our best fullback in decades IMO, and Plugger IS the best full foward of all time, those two reasons alone give the 96 side a big edge.

        Comment

        • j s
          Think positive!
          • Jan 2003
          • 3303

          #5
          I'd have MOL play on MOL - would be an interesting matchup.

          Comment

          • Damien
            Living in 2005
            • Jan 2003
            • 3713

            #6
            Originally posted by j s
            I'd have MOL play on MOL - would be an interesting matchup.
            Wonder if Roos could find a match up for Roos.

            FWIW I think 2006 would beat 1996.

            I think 1998 at full strength however could beat 2006 and should have been premiers that year and not those damn Crows!

            Comment

            • cruiser
              What the frack!
              • Jul 2004
              • 6114

              #7
              Originally posted by Damien
              I think 1998 at full strength however could beat 2006 and should have been premiers that year and not those damn Crows!
              As much the one that got away as 96.
              Occupational hazards:
              I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
              - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

              Comment

              • Bloody Hell
                Senior Player
                • Oct 2006
                • 3085

                #8
                Originally posted by Damien
                Wonder if Roos could find a match up for Roos.

                FWIW I think 2006 would beat 1996.

                I think 1998 at full strength however could beat 2006 and should have been premiers that year and not those damn Crows!
                I think the Roos/Roos take would be one of the most interesting....I don't think there's anyone who would convincingly be able to shut down Plugger from the 2006 team (but I think Dunkley could).

                And Hall on Roos...Hmmmmmmmmm, interesting.
                Last edited by Bloody Hell; 15 October 2006, 10:23 AM.
                The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819

                  #9
                  06 has no one who could stop Lockett. Biggest problem is getting the ball to him. 06 would be quite good at stopping supply through the half forward line.

                  Dunkley would probably be on Hall and force him to get his kicks too far up field.

                  Midfield would be a tough battle.

                  Probably more ball ups in this game than in all other games combined.

                  Low scoring dour contest.

                  Close win to 96.
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                  Comment

                  • swanhead2005
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 33

                    #10
                    Kirk vs. Kelly would be a good battle.

                    2006 O'Loughlin is probably not as fast as '96 O'Loughlin but has more experience and dice. Craig Bolton would probably do the job on 96 O'Loughlin; not sure who'd take the 2006 model.

                    Heuskes vs. Kennelly would be another entertaining match-up I'd like to see.

                    I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the 2006 side would win, by less than 5 points. They play a good shut-down game and Plugger would be starved, while being double-teamed by Leo Barry and Ted Richards. Also Goodes and O'Keefe are two guns the 96 side would have trouble controlling.
                    Last edited by swanhead2005; 15 October 2006, 12:33 PM.

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Damien
                      I think 1998 at full strength however could beat 2006
                      Yep. Adding Schwass makes a big difference.
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16778

                        #12
                        I suspect footballers on average are fitter and stronger than they were even ten years ago. So the 2006 outfit has a headstart and it's hard to compensate for that. Overall I think the 2006 team has more strong, match hardened bodies and they have learned what it takes to play pressure football. So long as Lockett's supply was held, I think 2006 would win quite comfortably.

                        1996 made it to the GF largely on the back of three superstars and lots of youthful enthusiasm. The likes of Heuskes, Seymour, Chapman, O'Loughlin and Grant were very young back then - they had no fear but I doubt they'd be the physical match for their probable opponents.

                        Lockett would be impossible to match-up on but I suspect 1996 would have similar problems with Hall. I think he'd run Dunks ragged. And who in the 1996 team would have a chance to keep up with Goodes in full-flight? Maybe Roos would get the gig but I suspect Goodesy might be too quick.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16778

                          #13
                          Originally posted by swanhead2005
                          Kirk vs. Kelly would be a good battle.

                          Not sure it would happen. Kelly, at his peak, had explosive speed and Kirk couldn't keep up. I reckon Roos might throw the challenge to McVeigh, with Kirk maybe lining up on Cressa. However, back in 1996 Cressa was pretty much a tagger himself. It wasn't until 1997-8 that he really emerged as a ballwinner. So maybe he'd go to Bolton and leave Kirk for someone like Dyson.

                          I reckon you'd have Ablett sent to run with Maxfield, and I'd love to see Monty and Chapman line up against each other.

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #14
                            Originally posted by liz
                            I suspect footballers on average are fitter and stronger than they were even ten years ago. So the 2006 outfit has a headstart and it's hard to compensate for that.
                            I think when comparing across eras you need to take this factor out.
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • liz
                              Veteran
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 16778

                              #15
                              Originally posted by NMWBloods
                              I think when comparing across eras you need to take this factor out.
                              But how? Do we have to try and guess how much ground the likes of Goodes and O'Keefe would have been able to cover had they played 10 years earlier?

                              Comment

                              Working...