Tweet
Does anyone have the TOG stats for the Grand Final? The whole team would be ace, but I'd be interested ideally to see what they were for, say, the bottom 6 players (bottom 6 as far as least minutes on ground).
-
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time -
Sorry Stell, I didn't keep the papers this year. -
Why not? Not a real fan is why not!
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
From a Hawks fan on BF
Player No Tog
Ablett 20 39
Barry 21 123
Bolton 24 99
Bolton 6 120
Buchanan 32 98
Davis 2 91
Dempster 26 103
Doyle 15 65
Fosdike 12 109
Goodes 37 121
Hall 1 123
Jolly 16 62
Kennelly 17 115
Kirk 31 110
Malceski 9 99
Mathews 4 110
McVeigh 3 108
O'Keefe 5 115
O'Loughlin 19 110
Richards 25 120
Roberts-Thomson 30 68
Schneider 13 107
Armstrong 35 66
Banfield 6 82
Braun 10 107
Butler 26 81
Chick 17 98
Cousins 9 108
Cox 20 102
Embley 32 109
Fletcher 7 116
Glass 23 118
Hansen 29 99
Hunter 39 123
Jones 38 99
Jones 18 100
Judd 3 119
Kerr 4 103
Lynch 21 120
Seaby 14 32
Selwood 37 115
Stenglein 5 118
Waters 8 109
Wirrpanda 44 92I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Stell you answered your own question,that wasnt so hard was it.Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...
Comment
-
This was more for my curiosity than anything, I realize that the ratings are a little flawed as they are just based on stats and don't take, for example, beating your direct opponent into account - Hall rated better than Glass originally! The ratings scores are from finalsiren.com) but if anybody is interested here they are (logic is based on a per48 minutes stat that is used with NBA stats, which is again a little flawed
)... anyway... what is that theor about it is what you get from your bottom X players that decide a game? We had 7 of the bottom 10 per 123 minutes.
Code:Player No Tog Rating Per minute Per 123 1 Kirk 31 110 118 1.072727273 131.9454545 2 Cox 20 102 96 0.941176471 115.7647059 3 Waters 8 109 99 0.908256881 111.7155963 4 Embley 32 109 97 0.889908257 109.4587156 5 Braun 10 107 92 0.859813084 105.7570093 6 Goodes 37 121 104 0.859504132 105.7190083 7 Selwood 37 115 98 0.852173913 104.8173913 8 Stenglein 5 118 99 0.838983051 103.1949153 9 Butler 26 81 66 0.814814815 100.2222222 10 Jones 38 99 77 0.777777778 95.66666667 11 Ablett 20 39 29 0.743589744 91.46153846 12 Hansen 29 99 72 0.727272727 89.45454545 13 Davis 2 91 66 0.725274725 89.20879121 14 Kerr 4 103 74 0.718446602 88.36893204 15 Fosdike 12 109 78 0.71559633 88.01834862 16 Judd 3 119 85 0.714285714 87.85714286 17 O'Keefe 5 115 82 0.713043478 87.70434783 18 Hunter 39 123 87 0.707317073 87 19 Buchanan 32 98 68 0.693877551 85.34693878 20 Cousins 9 108 74 0.685185185 84.27777778 21 Fletcher 7 116 78 0.672413793 82.70689655 22 Bolton 24 99 65 0.656565657 80.75757576 23 Schneider 13 107 67 0.626168224 77.01869159 24 Richards 25 120 73 0.608333333 74.825 25 O'Loughlin 19 110 65 0.590909091 72.68181818 26 Wirrpanda 44 92 53 0.576086957 70.85869565 27 Doyle 15 65 34 0.523076923 64.33846154 28 Banfield 6 82 42 0.512195122 63 29 Kennelly 17 115 56 0.486956522 59.89565217 30 Malceski 9 99 48 0.484848485 59.63636364 31 Mathews 4 110 53 0.481818182 59.26363636 32 Chick 17 98 46 0.469387755 57.73469388 33 Lynch 21 120 55 0.458333333 56.375 34 Roberts-Thomson 30 68 31 0.455882353 56.07352941 35 Barry 21 123 51 0.414634146 51 36 Armstrong 35 66 27 0.409090909 50.31818182 37 Dempster 26 103 42 0.40776699 50.15533981 38 Glass 23 118 48 0.406779661 50.03389831 39 Hall 1 123 50 0.406504065 50 40 Bolton 6 120 48 0.4 49.2 41 Jones 18 100 38 0.38 46.74 42 McVeigh 3 108 31 0.287037037 35.30555556 43 Jolly 16 62 10 0.161290323 19.83870968 44 Seaby 14 32 4 0.125 15.375
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
How did you get that extra width?Originally posted by stellation
This was more for my curiosity than anything, I realize that the ratings are a little flawed as they are just based on stats and don't take, for example, beating your direct opponent into account - Hall rated better than Glass originally! The ratings scores are from finalsiren.com) but if anybody is interested here they are (logic is based on a per48 minutes stat that is used with NBA stats, which is again a little flawed )... anyway... what is that theor about it is what you get from your bottom X players that decide a game? We had 7 of the bottom 10 per 123 minutes.
Code:Player No Tog Rating Per minute Per 123 1 Kirk 31 110 118 1.072727273 131.9454545 2 Cox 20 102 96 0.941176471 115.7647059 3 Waters 8 109 99 0.908256881 111.7155963 4 Embley 32 109 97 0.889908257 109.4587156 5 Braun 10 107 92 0.859813084 105.7570093 6 Goodes 37 121 104 0.859504132 105.7190083 7 Selwood 37 115 98 0.852173913 104.8173913 8 Stenglein 5 118 99 0.838983051 103.1949153 9 Butler 26 81 66 0.814814815 100.2222222 10 Jones 38 99 77 0.777777778 95.66666667 11 Ablett 20 39 29 0.743589744 91.46153846 12 Hansen 29 99 72 0.727272727 89.45454545 13 Davis 2 91 66 0.725274725 89.20879121 14 Kerr 4 103 74 0.718446602 88.36893204 15 Fosdike 12 109 78 0.71559633 88.01834862 16 Judd 3 119 85 0.714285714 87.85714286 17 O'Keefe 5 115 82 0.713043478 87.70434783 18 Hunter 39 123 87 0.707317073 87 19 Buchanan 32 98 68 0.693877551 85.34693878 20 Cousins 9 108 74 0.685185185 84.27777778 21 Fletcher 7 116 78 0.672413793 82.70689655 22 Bolton 24 99 65 0.656565657 80.75757576 23 Schneider 13 107 67 0.626168224 77.01869159 24 Richards 25 120 73 0.608333333 74.825 25 O'Loughlin 19 110 65 0.590909091 72.68181818 26 Wirrpanda 44 92 53 0.576086957 70.85869565 27 Doyle 15 65 34 0.523076923 64.33846154 28 Banfield 6 82 42 0.512195122 63 29 Kennelly 17 115 56 0.486956522 59.89565217 30 Malceski 9 99 48 0.484848485 59.63636364 31 Mathews 4 110 53 0.481818182 59.26363636 32 Chick 17 98 46 0.469387755 57.73469388 33 Lynch 21 120 55 0.458333333 56.375 34 Roberts-Thomson 30 68 31 0.455882353 56.07352941 35 Barry 21 123 51 0.414634146 51 36 Armstrong 35 66 27 0.409090909 50.31818182 37 Dempster 26 103 42 0.40776699 50.15533981 38 Glass 23 118 48 0.406779661 50.03389831 39 Hall 1 123 50 0.406504065 50 40 Bolton 6 120 48 0.4 49.2 41 Jones 18 100 38 0.38 46.74 42 McVeigh 3 108 31 0.287037037 35.30555556 43 Jolly 16 62 10 0.161290323 19.83870968 44 Seaby 14 32 4 0.125 15.375
Comment
-
Modesty forbids...Originally posted by ROK Lobster
How did you get that extra width?I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
It's long too.Originally posted by stellation
Modesty forbids...Comment
-
Too many decimal points!Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
Having 7 of the bottom 10, is in direct contrast to the 2005 GF and pretty well sums up why we won in 2005 and lost 2006.
West Coast got much more from their bottom 10 players this year, case in point Chick and Armstrong in the last quarter.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Comment
-
Clearly Roos was playing favourites.
I would be filthy if I was Kirky. Only 110 minutes compared to 123 for other 2 leaders Hall and Barry. Clearly on the outer.
Put a cross through Kirky for 2007 and take with a grain of salt what Roos said about rewarding Kirk, Hall and Barry. It is now only Hall and Barry, then again he may have been making room for Spider at the top.
I can't believe that the most perceptive person on this site hasn't picked this up by now.Comment
-
Sorry, i was feeding the cat.Originally posted by Nico
I can't believe that the most perceptive person on this site hasn't picked this up by now.Sit down or i swear to God i'll have you shot.Comment
Comment