Spida knows something . . .
Cousins may not be the last: Everitt
Collapse
X
-
I thought it was all Cousins fault, that no one else was to blame or could be considered responsible. Can you explain your inconsistent views?I still remember AFL fans taunting NRL fans about the issues that plagued the code 4 years ago. AFL thought that their code was above all that.
No code is safe these days from players being paid too much.
Agree its time Vlad and his yes men do something harsh and stop talking in corporate press releases!!Comment
-
Err ok.
Don't you have a letter or email to write to Benny expressing your sadness and some hate mail to send to Roos at the same time.
Get cracking boy..and maybe you can draw benny a picture.
I don't get what your point is.
Comment
-
Well, what are the dangers involed with paying players too much?Comment
-
You don't have to have gazillion bucks to be hooked on drugs. It helps when you have a huge pay packet....do i need to point out the obvious?
Do you know anyone who has an ice addiction? I know a few and they have all brought it on themselves as they knew the dangers of ICE but ignored it to the point of being too late, no matter how many times friends warned them.
Last time i checked Benny was 29 not 16.Comment
-
Comment
-
So then, what is the danger of paying players too much?You don't have to have gazillion bucks to be hooked on drugs. It helps when you have a huge pay packet....do i need to point out the obvious?
Do you know anyone who has an ice addiction? I know a few and they have all brought it on themselves as they knew the dangers of ICE but ignored it to the point of being too late, no matter how many times friends warned them.
Last time i checked Benny was 29 not 16.Comment
-
Not at the moment, but I don't understand your question in the context. You have said that Cousins has no one to blame but himself, but now you seem to be saying that if you pay players big bucks that causes problems. When some said elsewhere that part of the problem with Cousins (and others) could stem from the fact that they are paid a lot of money, you pretty much abused them. I am just wondering what your view is - and am not really sure how me knowing anyone with a drug problem is related to anything at all
Comment
-
Originally posted by NMWBloodsI have two close friends who are.No, no, no, NMWB. You're not allowed to have any junkie friends. Because anyone who knows, or has known, any junkies has to agree with Demsone. Knowledge of them and their filthy lyin', thievin', betrayin' ways automatically gives you insight into the accuracy of his views. So therefore, if you don't agree with him, you must be lying when you claim you know some. QED.Originally posted by DemsoneI am sure you do, i mean we all do on the interweb right. So have you helped them..have you used the same compassion shown on a forum when they have robbed you and destroyed your life.
I might have worked with dozens, and think that Demsone's argument is rubbish, but that's only because 'we all have on the interweb'.Comment
-
Rubbish in what way? Maybe you have the tolerance to be compassionate towards them and if you do well what can i say but well done have an elephant stamp for your efforts - but in no way would i ever have compassion for a junkie. Never.
Sorry for umm thinking that way..
Last edited by liz; 21 March 2007, 11:32 PM. Reason: Purported quoted text altered to reflect what was actually saidComment
-
No, I think it's a case of everyone else on RWO has him on their ignore list. You and I being new, have yet to learnWell my valid questions to sanecow have been deleted..i mean what is going on on this board when a troll is allowed to continue on his merry hateful ways and yet i get infraction upon infraction.
I guess sanecow hides his trolls as some kind of intelligent discussion then?
Comment
-
-

Comment