Blue v Bombers - game of the year?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xie Shan
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 2929

    #16
    There was a clever comment on BF about the difference between the Carlton/Essendon rivalry and our rivalry with West Coast.

    With ours, the winner gets a flag. With theirs, the loser gets Bryce Gibbs!

    It was a great game to watch, gotta love a shootout.

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #17
      Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
      A great game to watch. And McVeigh's mark was sensational! Was it a free kick under this years stupid interpretations though? Dumbass rule, seriously!
      The hands were in the back, so I reckon i should've been a free.

      Comment

      • 573v30
        On the bandwagon...
        • Sep 2005
        • 5017

        #18
        Originally posted by ScottH
        The hands were in the back, so I reckon i should've been a free.
        It should've been a free kick against McVeigh, but that would've spoiled the mark.
        I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #19
          Originally posted by 573v30
          It should've been a free kick against McVeigh, but that would've spoiled the mark.
          Sure. It was a great mark. Thats where the HITB rule could ruin the game because of marks like that, which could be a free against instead.

          Comment

          • ugg
            Can you feel it?
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 15970

            #20
            I was rooting for Carlton when Lloyd decided to get into Setanta's face after kicking an easy goal. Rode the Blues home, great victory in the end.
            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
            Reserves WIKI -
            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

            Comment

            • Chow-Chicker
              Senior Player
              • Jun 2006
              • 1602

              #21
              Originally posted by ScottH
              The hands were in the back, so I reckon i should've been a free.
              Yes, and this is where the rule becomes farcical.....the umpires obviously realise that paying the free kick is detrimental to the mark. I don't blame the umpires, it's the rules committee that needs to be lined up and shot.

              If the umpire paid the free kick - I reckon the stands would have been pulled down at the MCG. By not paying the free kick, we are seeing an uproar about why some are paid and why some are not.

              We saw a tiggy touchwood free paid to Lovett, but McVeigh's was allowed. You can't have this happening in the one game. Scrap the bloody thing altogether FFS.

              Comment

              Working...