Does anyone have an idea of how far a team is allowed to go, before it's decided that they're bringing the game into disrepute? I'm not just holding some grudge about last year's Grand Final, this is a genuine question because of the things that have gone down at the West Coast Eagles.
The definition of disrepute, is to damage or lose reputation, a loss of credibility etc, and this is surely what West Coast are doing to our game, the Chick incident is yet another blemish on the code. So where do we draw the line? why haven't they had points deducted? The Cousins' suspension is a big step, but it was taken too late, and isn't enough.
The definition of disrepute, is to damage or lose reputation, a loss of credibility etc, and this is surely what West Coast are doing to our game, the Chick incident is yet another blemish on the code. So where do we draw the line? why haven't they had points deducted? The Cousins' suspension is a big step, but it was taken too late, and isn't enough.
