The Injury and Tribunal Thread
Collapse
X
-
i say we rest kennelly and ablett no matter what, especially kennelly he is too crucial to rush back.Theres not much left to say -
The Injury and Tribunal Thread
There is lots going on with injuries, and a couple of 'oos and ahhs' from the commentators last night regarding potential reports... so I figured we could do with a thread to keep track of them.
Is this all?
Luke Ablett
Injury: Hyperextended knee. Scan on Monday. 0 Weeks to Season depending on severity. Best guess, 1-4 weeks.
Craig Bolton
Injury: Knee (Unknown). Walking wounded. Expected to play against the Kangaroos.
Amon Buchanan
Injury: Knee (MCL). Test. May play against the Kangaroos.
Sean Dempster
Injury: Knee (MCL). 5 weeks.
Adam Goodes
Injury: Shoulder. Walking wounded. Likely fit to play against the Kangaroos.
Tribunal: Forearm to the back of an opponent, in the final quarter. Likely to be cited, but even if convicted he is likely to get away with 90 odd points--given his good record.
Barry Hall
Injury: Knee (Unknown). Walking wounded. Likely fit to play against the Kangaroos.
Tribunal: Forearm to the back of opponent's head, early in the first quarter. Unlikely to be cited (opponent didn't go to ground), but if convicted is likely to be suspended for a week.
Tadhg Kennelly
Injury: Dislocated knee cap. Scan on Monday. 0 Weeks to Season depending on severity. Best guess, 2-6 weeks.
Lewis Roberts-Thomson
Injury: Foot stress fracture. Long term injury list.Comment
-
Injury Updates
There is a web site www.injuryupdates.com.au which has up to date reports.It gives you the latest reports.
Comment
-
Injuries? What injuries. Compared to other years we are travelling well.
Last year we lost Williams and Crouch to long term injuries, and our No.2 ruckman only got on the ground in the later half of the year.
This year the only serious injury is LRT and he should be back in the 2nd half of the year.Comment
-
Well done for putting it into perspective.Injuries? What injuries. Compared to other years we are travelling well.
Last year we lost Williams and Crouch to long term injuries, and our No.2 ruckman only got on the ground in the later half of the year.
This year the only serious injury is LRT and he should be back in the 2nd half of the year.The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of DisappointmentComment
-
We also should be in a better position to cover them this year, with practically no "depth" of note falling off the top of the list and those coming through a year stronger, fitter and more experienced.
Schmidt's come in, isn't staring but is doing his bit. Moore did the same yesterday. There are at least half a dozen running around in the magoos who I reckon can do the same - with Laidlaw and Jack heading the queue.Comment
-
Good point.We also should be in a better position to cover them this year, with practically no "depth" of note falling off the top of the list and those coming through a year stronger, fitter and more experienced.
Schmidt's come in, isn't staring but is doing his bit. Moore did the same yesterday. There are at least half a dozen running around in the magoos who I reckon can do the same - with Laidlaw and Jack heading the queue.
We have depth to cover the "short term" injuries that we got last night.
Laidlaw can come in because he has the ability to step up into Kennelly's role for a few matches (not for full matches, you'd expect Roos to switch Malceksi to that role and Laidlaw and maybe even Goodes for a spell to take over Malceksi's role, but whatever happens there will be a bit of mixing and matching going on.)
For Ablett, I would bring Buchanan back in (if fit of course) and move Schmidt into Ablett's role and allow Buchanan to go back his normal role. That way you have Jolly/Everitt, Moore, Fosdike and maybe Schneider starting on the bench before the normal rotations start to take effect.Once was, now elsewhereComment
-
Robbie, I usually like your incisive comments but that lot has my head spinning.Good point.
We have depth to cover the "short term" injuries that we got last night.
Laidlaw can come in because he has the ability to step up into Kennelly's role for a few matches (not for full matches, you'd expect Roos to switch Malceksi to that role and Laidlaw and maybe even Goodes for a spell to take over Malceksi's role, but whatever happens there will be a bit of mixing and matching going on.)
For Ablett, I would bring Buchanan back in (if fit of course) and move Schmidt into Ablett's role and allow Buchanan to go back his normal role. That way you have Jolly/Everitt, Moore, Fosdike and maybe Schneider starting on the bench before the normal rotations start to take effect.
Now for starters, no one regardless of whatever depth we have, can replace Kennelly or be expected to cover his role for a few weeks. He is about the best in the comp in his role. Makes for interesting thought though on how or if our game plan changes any.
As for the midfield, they all seem to rotate through the same role, except for the time on the ground. "Svengali" Roos is the only one that can work out what he does. Good guess though.Comment
-
On the lighter side to our injuries, SEN's Liam Pickering said today that you would expect with our record that all injured players from last night will play. They have a cupboard full of tricks he said.
Kennelly - plastic knee replacement, will play.
Ablett - Nothing wrong with him given the call after the game, "the Swans have no serious injuries".
Goodes - shoulder replacement, will play.
Great chuckles at the no serious injuries report.Comment
-
Did I manage to get it off its axis
I can understand what you are getting at and to that end I agree with you - no one can FULLY replace Kennelly and his role in our (just look at the first two matches of last season when he didn't play to see the impact). But the difference from Round 1 and 2 last year to Round 6 this year is that we have players who have the ability to step and fill the role (be it 80% to how Kennelly can do that same role) for a handful of weeks until Kennelly is once again fit enough to play.Now for starters, no one regardless of whatever depth we have, can replace Kennelly or be expected to cover his role for a few weeks. He is about the best in the comp in his role.
Yes losing Kennelly for even one week will hurt us, but as I was trying to point out that by shifting Malceski into Kennelly's position and bringing in Laidlaw to fill the gap Malceski's switch will open up, we can use the depth within our squad and also not have mess around too much with our gameplan. Of course if Kennelly was to be out for the season then a stopgap messure wouldn't be needed, messing around with the gameplan would.
But don't think for a second that I was suggesting the Malceski or Laidlaw would be able to replace Kennelly in the team without us even noticing. Even I agree that is crazy talk.
I does and hence my suggestions. 1 to 3 weeks I suggest you just move the deck chairs around and bring in Laidlaw. Any longer and you seriously have to look at changing the gameplan. You'd think Roos would see how we go this week (plus any news on how long he is out for) without Kennelly before making any rash decision.Makes for interesting thought though on how or if our game plan changes any.
I stopped trying to figure out the midfield a long time a ago. All I know is we have "types" of midfielders, which seems to get longer as a list each season.As for the midfield, they all seem to rotate through the same role, except for the time on the ground. "Svengali" Roos is the only one that can work out what he does. Good guess though.Once was, now elsewhereComment
-
Last edited by liz; 30 April 2007, 01:29 AM.Comment

Comment