What's the deal with Vogels?

[ItsAllGoodes]

I dont think that the Swans see that there is room for both Vogels and Richards - as the "versatile, play them back but throw them forward occasionally" player. Thats not me saying he should or shouldnt get a game, but thats where i think the Swans see him

[swantastic]

I dont think that the Swans see that there is room for both Vogels and Richards - as the "versatile, play them back but throw them forward occasionally" player. Thats not me saying he should or shouldnt get a game, but thats where i think the Swans see him

Vogels or Richards its a hard one.

[Bloody Hell]

I dont think that the Swans see that there is room for both Vogels and Richards - as the "versatile, play them back but throw them forward occasionally" player. Thats not me saying he should or shouldnt get a game, but thats where i think the Swans see him

I don't think those 2 will play the same role.

Richards is KP. I think even though Vogels could play KP, he'd more likely be a tall flanker, whether up forward or down back. As I said, I think he's more comparible to Kennelly, Dempster etc....it's a mute point now with those guys back, and LRT to come back shortly. My point was he should have come in for these type of players rather than trying to cover their positions with smaller in and under type players. I can't see why he didn't - other than Roos doesn't rate him.