McVeigh

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vanberlo=god
    On the Rookie List
    • Apr 2007
    • 75

    #16
    drop mcveigh

    pleaaasssseeeeeeeeee

    has not improved, has gone complete 180 from last year and is treading back towards 'hack' county.

    everything he has done this year has peeved me.
    he is useless, please swap him with a youngster they need more time, brabazon or someone else.

    Comment

    • doctor swan
      On the Rookie List
      • May 2007
      • 266

      #17
      looks like mcveigh is the the new boo boy of r&w online....i wonder why

      Comment

      • Triple B
        Formerly 'BBB'
        • Feb 2003
        • 6999

        #18
        Originally posted by BBB
        [Mod edit: Text removed]
        Please read rule 2) Flaming/abusive threads and rule 3) Trolling of the RWO Rules.
        Garbage.

        And they reckon the AFL umpires are inconsistent with rules for one and not for the other. They've got nothing on the inconsistency of moderation here.

        Edit : Did you read the rules? Did you see this?
        Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the rules below.
        If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
        Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
        If you have a problem with moderation, please PM a moderator, as requested.
        Last edited by Frog; 13 May 2007, 11:26 PM. Reason: Official Warning. Further Violation of RWO rules.
        Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

        Comment

        • ROK Lobster
          RWO Life Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 8658

          #19
          Originally posted by BBB
          Garbage.

          And they reckon the AFL umpires are inconsistent with rules for one and not for the other. They've got nothing on the inconsistency of moderation here.
          Suck it up.

          Comment

          • swantastic
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2006
            • 7275

            #20
            Originally posted by BBB
            Garbage.

            And they reckon the AFL umpires are inconsistent with rules for one and not for the other. They've got nothing on the inconsistency of moderation here.
            At least the mods dont have HITB rule
            Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

            Comment

            • reigning premier
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Sep 2006
              • 4335

              #21
              OK... I admit it, I was wrong.

              I defended McVeigh last week all over these boards because I still thought he had something to offer. But after Saturday night, he's just gotta go. Everytime he went near the ball it was a mess. On the few times he managed to gain posession, it was a clanger. It was just awful to watch.

              Wish it wasn't so, but he seriously needs to be dropped. He's in a Key position and it's costing us week in, week out.

              Comment

              • Jeffers1984
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4564

                #22
                Another McVeigh supporter here. But his tickets have certainly run out. I really hope he can turn it around but it will have to be via the reserves where he won't do us any damage.

                Just so depressing to see such a promising player go down the dumps so quickly.
                Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

                Comment

                • RogueSwan
                  McVeigh for Brownlow
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 4602

                  #23
                  I have openly been a McVeigh fan but this year I feel I backed the wrong horse. It is perplexing to see Schmidt and Moore relegated while Fumbles McVeigh keeps getting a game. There must be something the coaches see that we don't. Either that or he is doing what Roos wants!
                  "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                  Comment

                  • DurrrtySouth
                    On the Rookie List
                    • May 2007
                    • 18

                    #24
                    Originally posted by doctor swan
                    looks like mcveigh is the the new boo boy of r&w online....i wonder why


                    because he's no good

                    Comment

                    • RogueSwan
                      McVeigh for Brownlow
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 4602

                      #25
                      Originally posted by DurrrtySouth
                      because he's no good
                      and I seriously hope it's "just a phase he is going through".
                      "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                      Comment

                      • lovetheswannies
                        On the Rookie List
                        • May 2007
                        • 49

                        #26
                        okay.. i've been on the drop mcveigh band wagon since round 1 but i've decided to change my tune...

                        he's got potential so i'm gonna stick with him for a bit... anyone want to join?

                        Comment

                        • Snake
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 330

                          #27
                          McVeigh is pathetic, terrible skills, constant clangers, no hardness. I hope he rots in the seconds for rest off his career.

                          Comment

                          • elroy67
                            Parking Cars
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 419

                            #28
                            Originally posted by liz
                            It must get to a stage where confidence is so low that its not going to return by being on the receiving end of more of the same. I'm not prepared to consign him to the recycling bin by a long way yet, but give him a couple of weeks to get leather poisoning in Canberra, with almost no defensive responsibility, and the chance to put in one of those 6 goal / 40 possession performances that he and Malceski used to rack up before they cemented their spots in the senior team. Let him go back and have some fun playing football again. It may be all he needs.
                            Agreed. And I think that the frustration being felt by many would be alleviated if there was some form of acknowledgement of poor form through action of the match commitee, rather than simple platitudes from the coach.

                            At some point underperforming players must go back to the 2's, if only to provide inspiration for those already struggling there. What is the point of the 2's if senior players cannot be dropped to provide chances for the newer players? I've not seen much of the seconds over the last few years, but it is quite clear many posters are of the opinion that there are some there that at least deserve a chance at senior level.
                            We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

                            Comment

                            • giant
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4731

                              #29
                              I'd be surprised if he isn't dropped this week. It's so obvious that he's lost all confidence in his footy. Making no impact as a tagger & with Bolton already a lost soul wandering aimlessly in the forward line, they can't afford another lame duck up there.

                              That said, if he is dropped, he'll need to be replaced by another tagger, probably Moore, which I suspect won't delight many people on this forum. Will depend on the match-ups as always - perhaps a week's reprieve to take on Burgoyne Jr?

                              Comment

                              • Plugger46
                                Senior Player
                                • Apr 2003
                                • 3674

                                #30
                                I've been a long time McVeigh supporter - thought he was pretty good last year, but he's certainly running out of tickets. He might benefit from a week in the reserves - get heaps of the pill and get some confidence back.
                                Bloods

                                "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                                Comment

                                Working...