Everitt - Lift your game onballers!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt79
    Bring it on!
    • Sep 2004
    • 3143

    Everitt - Lift your game onballers!



    Yep, the onballers need to lift their game!!

    Everitt says the club's woes stem from failures of onballers, and a massive gap between consistent and inconsistent players - many within the senior ranks.

    "Most of our onballers are probably the main non-consistent players for the year, unfortunately it's probably the part that's let us down the most," he said.
    Swannies for life!
  • Blood Oath
    Still bleeding from 06
    • Oct 2005
    • 80

    #2
    My mate who is a Saints supporter laghed at me last nite when i was talking of our ills, he blames it all on the Big Spida! The theory goes that the year he was out the Aints made the granny, just after he left they started playing finals, he went to the Hawks after they had been playing finals - once he got there they stopped, now that he has left look at the old poo & wee stripes now!!! Just his theory, I hope it is wrong!!!
    J E T T A
    R O H A N

    Comment

    • hammo
      Veterans List
      • Jul 2003
      • 5554

      #3
      "My experience, unfortunately, when we stayed in these slumps we pretty much stayed in them, we never got out of them, so (my advice) wouldn't be too valuable to a lot of people," he said.


      But at least he's maintained his sense of humour:

      "There's just too few guys playing good football, good consistent football, look at Ryan O'Keefe, I suppose Ben Mathews, Leo Barry and Craig Bolton are probably our four best players and probably Kirky (Brett Kirk).
      "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #4
        RSS: Midfield needs to lift: Everitt

        Peter Everitt says he and his midfield mates need to improve

        More...


        (This post was automatically generated from news items on www.sydneyswans.com.au )

        Comment

        • nat
          On the Rookie List
          • Oct 2006
          • 501

          #5
          Hm..

          "Then there's maybe eight to 10 who have been so inconsistent this year, it puts us all in a dangerous position."
          Why doesn't he just go straight ahead and name these 8-10 players?

          He annoys me.

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #6
            He was on Ch10 news saying the same thing. Also mentioned that he was one of the the seniors that needed to lift.

            Comment

            • Matt79
              Bring it on!
              • Sep 2004
              • 3143

              #7
              Originally posted by nat
              Hm..
              Why doesn't he just go straight ahead and name these 8-10 players?
              He annoys me.

              To be fair to Spider, if Roos or Hall don't name them then it would not go down too well if he decided to name the players himself. Not his role.
              Swannies for life!

              Comment

              • Nico
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 11339

                #8
                Dont have to be Einstein to work out who they are. Jolly dominated the centre bounce ruckwork yet the saints players were always first to the footy.

                Montagna was on Bolton at many centre bounces and he beat him to it everytime. It didn't matter what direction it went they got it. The only exception was in the first few minutes when Jolly went the big punch, but strangely that stopped.
                http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                Comment

                • TheHood
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 1938

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Matt79
                  To be fair to Spider, if Roos or Hall don't name them then it would not go down too well if he decided to name the players himself. Not his role.
                  Maybe naming them is going too fare but we know who they are:

                  Jude (just down and out and in real danger of ACT)
                  Goodesy (so much pressure but isn't reading the ball like 2006)
                  Macca (must run harder to make more contests)
                  Monty (when he was playing)
                  Schnides (not consistent eoungh)
                  Fossy (working hard but again need more inpact from disposals)
                  and even Kirky has gone to sleep at times
                  Then there's the stand ins that aren't confident, Moorey, Schmidty & co

                  It really is a bit part mid-field when you look at it. As much as I love these guys, I would say that is disappointing that the following are probably leading the B & F:

                  Mal
                  Tiger
                  Jolly
                  Leo
                  ROK
                  Craig
                  Kirky
                  Benny
                  Everitt
                  Hall

                  I would suggest that the leaderboard should be a lot different.
                  The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16772

                    #10
                    Originally posted by hammo


                    But at least he's maintained his sense of humour:


                    Quote:
                    "There's just too few guys playing good football, good consistent football, look at Ryan O'Keefe, I suppose Ben Mathews, Leo Barry and Craig Bolton are probably our four best players and probably Kirky (Brett Kirk).
                    To be fair, in you measure good consistent football in terms of who has most often played to his ability and in the same roles he has done in the past, that is probably spot on. If everyone else was playing close to their potential, Mathew's contribution would be pretty valuable and we'd say his was doing his job. The problem is that when so many others are playing poorly, his limitations become more apparent.

                    Comment

                    • BigD
                      Swans Tragic No. 1
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 394

                      #11
                      IMHO outside of Rhino(Keefe) and maybe Captain(Kirk) I don't think anyone is playing anywhere near their best footy. We're missing Tiger in a big way too.
                      Red & White forever.

                      Comment

                      • ROK Lobster
                        RWO Life Member
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 8658

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BigD
                        IMHO outside of Rhino(Keefe) and maybe Captain(Kirk) I don't think anyone is playing anywhere near their best footy. We're missing Tiger in a big way too.
                        What about Malceski.

                        That Kirk is playong his best footy is a sad state of affairs.

                        Comment

                        • nat
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 501

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Matt79
                          To be fair to Spider, if Roos or Hall don't name them then it would not go down too well if he decided to name the players himself. Not his role.
                          I was being sarcastic.

                          The way i worded it was probably bad, but i didn't mean what you thought i ment, even though i can see what you thought i ment by the way i worded it.

                          When i said 'he annoys me' i ment HE ANNOYS ME for saying stuff like that, putting the blame on 8-10 players and then telling everyone about it. That's why i said 'why doesn't he just go ahead and name them all'.. in a sarcastic way.

                          Anyway, i'm confusing myself now but what he said annoyed me.

                          Comment

                          • Matt79
                            Bring it on!
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 3143

                            #14
                            Originally posted by nat
                            I was being sarcastic.

                            The way i worded it was probably bad, but i didn't mean what you thought i ment, even though i can see what you thought i ment by the way i worded it.

                            When i said 'he annoys me' i ment HE ANNOYS ME for saying stuff like that, putting the blame on 8-10 players and then telling everyone about it. That's why i said 'why doesn't he just go ahead and name them all'.. in a sarcastic way.

                            Anyway, i'm confusing myself now but what he said annoyed me.

                            Because it is hard to read tone from an email / written post this would have helped...

                            But no dramas!!
                            Swannies for life!

                            Comment

                            • ScottH
                              It's Goodes to cheer!!
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 23665

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ROK Lobster
                              What about Malceski.

                              That Kirk is playong his best footy is a sad state of affairs.
                              Yes, Malceski has been one of the best, along with CBolts.

                              As for Kirk, I'd say he is playing better than some of his team mates but not at his best.

                              Comment

                              Working...