Win or lose, will Lloyd and Lucas tear us a new one?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    #16
    Originally posted by NMWBloods
    I think Hird is too smart to be on Kennelly, and I think Sheedy is too smart to leave Hird on Kennelly. In other words, Kennelly is not a tight defensive player and I think Hird would find too much space and be too damaging. In return, I doubt if Hird could do a stopping job on Kennelly's run from the backline, hence someone else would mind Kennelly.
    Agree with that fully. Nice change, isn't it

    At some stage the opposition are going to start tagging Kennelly hard. That's where Eski AND Dempster can come into their own.

    I'd reckon somebody like McVeigh.M. may play a negating role on Kennelly and still give them something the other way.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      #17
      wouldn't the mcveigh's be proud to see their sons lining up against each other and tagging each other for the whole game.
      all the effort driving them around as kids paying off.
      noice.

      ok .. back to the footy chatter kiddies ...

      i'd put crouchy on hird.
      leo on lloyd
      b2 and/or benny on lucas.

      Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
      Each time the ball is delivered into the Bomber's forward 50, i can't help visualizing Matty taking a big, strong grab, on the lead. Then, it usually comes true.
      deadly, maybe you should just stop visualising.
      Last edited by AnnieH; 29 May 2007, 09:59 PM.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • ernie koala
        Senior Player
        • May 2007
        • 3251

        #18
        Originally posted by TheHood

        McVeigh on McVeigh? Now that would be interesting?
        'Our McVeigh' would get flogged.
        Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #19
          Originally posted by ernie koala
          'Our McVeigh' would get flogged.
          that's the sad reality.
          maybe mummy mcveigh can tell their mcveigh to leave our mcveigh alone ... aka, "don't make me come down there"!!
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • DeadlyAkkuret
            Veterans List
            • Oct 2006
            • 4547

            #20
            Originally posted by top40
            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            The Bombers have an extraordinary record of accurate goal kicking against Sydney. Here's some telling stats:

            Round 19 1993 Full Time: they kicked 18-9
            Round 18 1999 Full Time: they kicked 15-3
            Round 11 2003 Full Time: they kicked 12-7
            Round 7 2005 Half Time: they'd kicked 10-1 (14-4 at Full time)
            Round 19 2005 Half Time: they'd again kicked 10-1
            Round 1 2006 Quarter Time: they'd kicked 9-1 (17-6 at Full Time)
            I knew i was on the mark, damn those are scary stats I still think Sydney will win, by about 4-6 goals, but it's hard not to worry about Lloyd and the accuracy of the Bombers. Maybe Davis can play a prank and hide their kicking boots this weekend? Or steal them, he hasn't been very accurate this season.

            Comment

            • reigning premier
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Sep 2006
              • 4335

              #21
              So it's settled then.....

              B2 on Lloyd...

              Dempster on Lucas...

              Barry on Hird.... (If he plays fwd)

              That leaves Kennelly as our "spare" backman.. Looks good to me!

              Comment

              • Robbo
                On the Rookie List
                • May 2007
                • 2946

                #22
                The best way to counter their influence is to take away their space. I think I hear a flood.

                Comment

                • Triple B
                  Formerly 'BBB'
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 6999

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Robbo
                  The best way to counter their influence is to take away their space. I think I hear a flood.
                  The ONLY way to counter their influence is unrelenting pressure from the midfield.

                  If the ball comes freely and quickly from the midfield it makes not one iota of difference who plays on who, Lloyd and Lucas will 'tear us a new one' the same as Hall and Magic will tear Michael and Fletcher apart if the service is good from our midfield.

                  In this day and age of not being able to lay a fingernail on the leading forward (I realise it's always been the case with Lloyd) it is damn nigh impossible to stop a leading forward who gets good delivery.
                  Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                  Comment

                  • hammo
                    Veterans List
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 5554

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Annie Haddad

                    i'd put crouchy on hird.
                    leo on lloyd
                    b2 and/or benny on lucas.
                    With that height advantage they'd win by 10 goals
                    "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                    Comment

                    • AnnieH
                      RWOs Black Sheep
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 11332

                      #25
                      Originally posted by hammo
                      With that height advantage they'd win by 10 goals
                      it's been said many-a-time that our backline, for a pack of short-arses, play like their 20 feet tall and i've also heard that they can sometimes be very damaging as well.

                      ye of little faith.
                      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                      Comment

                      • originalswan
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 550

                        #26
                        Can't get to the game, but would love it if Swans supporters would hold up score sheets for the "dive bomber Lloyd".

                        His dives are usually worthy of a faultless 10.

                        Comment

                        • Eala ?ireann
                          Beidh an l? linn!
                          • Dec 2005
                          • 256

                          #27
                          Originally posted by NMWBloods
                          I think Hird is too smart to be on Kennelly, and I think Sheedy is too smart to leave Hird on Kennelly. In other words, Kennelly is not a tight defensive player and I think Hird would find too much space and be too damaging. In return, I doubt if Hird could do a stopping job on Kennelly's run from the backline, hence someone else would mind Kennelly.

                          Dempster on Lucas is interesting. Dempster is pretty tall, but doesn't play that way (like Kennelly). I would worry about marking contests.

                          I'd prefer to see C Bolton on Lloyd than Barry. Maybe Barry on Lucas.
                          Can't disagree with any of that.
                          Ar aghaidh chun bua 2007!

                          Comment

                          • reigning premier
                            Suspended by the MRP
                            • Sep 2006
                            • 4335

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Eala ?ireann
                            Can't disagree with any of that.
                            You're not trying hard enough....

                            Comment

                            • swantastic
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2006
                              • 7275

                              #29
                              Originally posted by reigning premier
                              Lucas is the danger.. Though I hope he kicks 8 goals and Lloyd none as he's in my dream team...

                              But seriously, I think we should be looking to the likes of Dempster to take on Lucas. We need someone with a bit of speed to keep on him when he bursts fwd on the lead.

                              As for Lloyd, well doesn't really matter. He'll get 5 frees in front of goal. It's just a matter of how many he kicks.
                              Mine too RP,and your right about Lourdy Talky he will get a ton of free's right in front.
                              Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                              Comment

                              Working...