TLM Rnd 12

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ludwig
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 9359

    #16
    I thought Goodes had perhaps his best game of the season. It's hard to look good when the rest of your team mates as so bad.

    ROK and Ted were okay. Kirk was steady, but not influential. Schmidt played well for a rookie. Was probably amongst the best midfielders.

    But a mediocre performance can win you a Swans' BOG for that game.

    Comment

    • Margie
      Regular in the Side
      • Sep 2003
      • 800

      #17
      IMO Goodes was definitely best for us. Tried his heart out and presented more often than others. ROK was second best, followed by Kirk/Richards. Not that anyone was outstanding - on our team anyway.

      Comment

      • RogueSwan
        McVeigh for Brownlow
        • Apr 2003
        • 4602

        #18
        Originally posted by Margie
        IMO Goodes was definitely best for us. Tried his heart out and presented more often than others. ROK was second best, followed by Kirk/Richards. Not that anyone was outstanding - on our team anyway.
        that is pretty much how I saw it apart from ROK. That miss at the start of the 3rd quarter was dismal, really could have pumped the team up. What has happened to his accuracy?
        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

        Comment

        • Hazcam
          On the Rookie List
          • Jun 2007
          • 324

          #19
          i guess rok's inaccuracy has been matched with davis and o'loughlin etc accuracy. i'd like to know what our % success rate has been since roosy blasted us when we missed all those chances vs adelaide. i think its been pretty good since then.

          goodes was our BOG but about 10 magpies players surpassed his effect in what was a pure "sydney like" team effort by collingwood

          Comment

          Working...