Can someone please explain to me why Mathews is still in the side?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbo
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2007
    • 2946

    Can someone please explain to me why Mathews is still in the side?

    Jesus Christ. As you would probably know already, this is another Benny bashing thread. Now I don't want to hear this wank about his "tagging" abilities.

    He's a liability - That's the bottom line.

    What about that mark he dropped in the 1st quarter from the kick in? Schmidt and Laidlaw both would of swallowed that. Speaking of these two, why are they playing in the amateur comp when this hack is in the side week in week out?

    He adds nothing in attack, and is so slow that he has to shunt to change direction like the Indian Pacific.

    Reputation, reputation, reputation.
  • 573v30
    On the bandwagon...
    • Sep 2005
    • 5017

    #2
    Ask the leadership group, they must have an answer...
    I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

    Comment

    • NMWBloods
      Taking Refuge!!
      • Jan 2003
      • 15819

      #3
      Well, he's really in because of his defensive ability. Did a very good job on Lockyer.

      Gives us nothing in attack though.

      Roos seems to prefer defence over offence, which means that our side is more geared to stopping opposition goals than scoring goals ourselves, and that has been a problem for a while.
      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

      Comment

      • shaun..
        Stuck in Reserves
        • Jun 2007
        • 691

        #4
        Yep he's doing his job when he and his opponent cannot be seen on the tele
        "In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.Roos

        Comment

        • melb_blood69
          On the Rookie List
          • Sep 2006
          • 9

          #5
          mathews shouldn't be in the side with kennelly out. it makes the back half too slow. with kennelly out i would rather see dempster in. need someone at lease capable at breaking the lines. everything piece of play was too slow. why won't someone in our team play on. no risk = no win

          Comment

          • Missy
            On the Rookie List
            • Mar 2006
            • 445

            #6
            Originally posted by melb_blood69
            need someone at lease capable at breaking the lines.
            At least.

            Comment

            • doctor swan
              On the Rookie List
              • May 2007
              • 266

              #7
              hopefully he will join crouchy in retirement at seasons end.

              Comment

              • Captain
                Captain of the Side
                • Feb 2004
                • 3602

                #8
                He was one of the few that actually did his job.

                Comment

                • Robbo
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2007
                  • 2946

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Captain
                  He was one of the few that actually did his job.
                  What's his job? Sabotaging us?

                  Roosy seems to love him though.

                  Comment

                  • dendol
                    fat-arsed midfielder
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 1483

                    #10
                    think people are remembering his dropped mark in the 1st quarter and basing his performance on that. Far from our worst last night, he had a job to tag someone out of the game and did it well. Roos (and everyone else) well knows his limitations - he gives nothing in attack but does most defensive jobs adequately.

                    Comment

                    • Robbo
                      On the Rookie List
                      • May 2007
                      • 2946

                      #11
                      But simply tagging someone out of the game isn't good enough. In this day and age, players need to be able to do more than that.

                      He simply doesn't cut it.

                      Comment

                      • dendol
                        fat-arsed midfielder
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 1483

                        #12
                        there are still many effective pure taggers in the AFL who get a game every week. Most teams have one or two at most, but the problem with the Swans is that we have about 6 taggers getting a game every week.

                        Comment

                        • Robbo
                          On the Rookie List
                          • May 2007
                          • 2946

                          #13
                          If you look at the better taggers in the comp like Baker, Stenglein and Rawlings, they are very good defensively but still offer something going forward.

                          Comment

                          • dendol
                            fat-arsed midfielder
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 1483

                            #14
                            True, but when your job is to keep the most damaging player of the opposition quiet, you're not really asked to give too much going forward. You are rated on your defensive job, nothing else.

                            Comment

                            • Robbo
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2007
                              • 2946

                              #15
                              But is Lockyer Collingwood's most damaging player?

                              Comment

                              Working...