Leo snubs the media

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hammo
    Veterans List
    • Jul 2003
    • 5554

    #16
    Originally posted by Sanecow
    The details weren't broadcast though?!
    Some of the details were broadcast in Melbourne.
    "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

    Comment

    • Sanecow
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Mar 2003
      • 6917

      #17
      Originally posted by hammo
      Some of the details were broadcast in Melbourne.
      Was anyone watching?

      Comment

      • connolly
        Registered User
        • Aug 2005
        • 2461

        #18
        Originally posted by Mr_Juicy
        Leo Barry has snubbed a channel seven reporter by telling them he would not answer any questions asked because of the latest drug handling incident. Good on him
        Preumably the 7 network is in meltdown not being able to report that Leo is taking it one game at a time and that next weeks game will be approached as a final?
        Bevo bandwagon driver

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #19
          Originally posted by Sanecow
          Was anyone watching?
          Apparently it was on the early news, but was not allowed by the 6pm news.

          So only old people and kids not doing their homework.

          Comment

          • Damien
            Living in 2005
            • Jan 2003
            • 3713

            #20
            Originally posted by ScottH
            Apparently it was on the early news, but was not allowed by the 6pm news.

            So only old people and kids not doing their homework.
            I saw it on the 6pm news, was sitting in pub before walking to Telstra Dome for the Saints/Weagles match.

            Sound wasn't on and I didn't see the 4.30pm news, so I have no idea if the story was changed at all. It was promoted heavily throughout that stupid 'open a suitcase' gameshow with Andrew O'Keefe.

            Comment

            • satchmopugdog
              Bandicoots ears
              • Apr 2004
              • 3691

              #21
              Originally posted by ScottH
              Apparently it was on the early news, but was not allowed by the 6pm news.

              So only old people and kids not doing their homework.
              I heard it and read it...mind you I'm old and my daughter ws doing her homework.
              "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #22
                Originally posted by Damien
                I saw it on the 6pm news, was sitting in pub before walking to Telstra Dome for the Saints/Weagles match.

                Sound wasn't on and I didn't see the 4.30pm news, so I have no idea if the story was changed at all. It was promoted heavily throughout that stupid 'open a suitcase' gameshow with Andrew O'Keefe.
                Only going by what I was told. Can't believe everything I guess, that's why I said apprently.

                Originally posted by satchmopugdog
                I heard it and read it...mind you I'm old and my daughter ws doing her homework.
                Had your hearing aid turn up?

                Comment

                • dimelb
                  pr. dim-melb; m not f
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 6889

                  #23
                  Originally posted by ScottH
                  Apparently it was on the early news, but was not allowed by the 6pm news.

                  So only old people and kids not doing their homework.
                  It was on the 6 pm news, gave the club's name but not the players' names. When the time came to repeat the headlines it was omitted because they had been told of the injunction.
                  Appalling journalism. Confidentiality disregarded. And apparently there has been a meltdown in the ratings as scores of thousands (~60,000 acc to The Age) have switched to Ch 9.
                  Good on Leo and the others. And even if it was found in the gutter there was a duty to hand it in to the people who lost it, not sell it to the highest bidder - what a slug.
                  He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                  Comment

                  • Nico
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 11330

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Sanecow
                    I think it's a no-brainer that it is in the public interest for the names of AFL drug users to be released?!
                    If a player was drug tested at a booze bus and was found to have used an illicit drug it would have been in the news instantly.

                    Cousins running from the booze bus was on the news before he got home.
                    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                    Comment

                    • The Boot
                      A Blood to the bootstraps
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 544

                      #25
                      Police can lay charges of "theft by finding", a wonderful way of penalising scumbags who steal and then later say they "found it .. errr .. in a gutter". Yeah, right. Outside the place it should have been rightfully returned.

                      What possesses one to think that what they "found" is for sale to the highest bidder, completely escapes me. Yes, there are some things that are in the public interest - and some posters are arguing along those lines. But a player has the right to the laws of natural justice and procedural fairness, like anyone else.

                      Seven have well and truly stepped over the line this time.
                      Good men do good deeds. Evil men do evil deeds. But it takes religion for a good man to do evil deeds.

                      Comment

                      • barry
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 8499

                        #26
                        Embarrasingly petulant display by Leo Barry. Shame.

                        There are plenty of legal ways to stop these sort of publications, and those have already been done, so there is no need for players to act like children now.

                        Comment

                        • royboy42
                          Senior Player
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 2076

                          #27
                          [QUOTE=Sanecow;329448]Uh, no. It's a fairly easy chain to follow that Australian tax dollars go to the AFL; AFL funds go to clubs; Club funds go to players. Public interest.


                          ummm what tax dollars go to the afl???lots of tax PAYERS dollars, but no tax derived dollars..yr argument is , at best,weak. No public interest!

                          Comment

                          • Sanecow
                            Suspended by the MRP
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 6917

                            #28
                            If you want to be a pedant, go ahead but the fact is that around a freaking third of my money goes to the Government before I get to spend a cent and then they take another @@@@ing bite when I spend what little is left. I'd be interested to hear where you think the money the government spends comes from.

                            Comment

                            • Mr_Juicy
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 397

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
                              The action is being taken by players to punish Channel 7 for publishing details of (stolen) confidential player medical records. It has nothing to do with alleged or actual drug use.
                              I can't believe the amount of fools going around who think otherwise.

                              Comment

                              • Bloody Hell
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 3085

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
                                Rampant drug use in the AFL is a serious issue for the whole community...
                                Please explain.
                                The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                                Comment

                                Working...