Team V Pies...No Kennelly/Buchanan

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt79
    Bring it on!
    • Sep 2004
    • 3143

    Team V Pies...No Kennelly/Buchanan

    SYDNEY
    B: Richards, Barry, Roberts-Thomson
    HB: Bevan, C.Bolton, Mathews
    C: Malceski, Kirk, McVeigh
    HF: R.O'Keefe, O'Loughlin, Fosdike
    F: Schneider, Hall, Davis
    FOLL: Jolly, J.Bolton, Goodes
    I/C: Barlow, Crouch, Dempster, Everitt
    EM: Schmidt, Buchanan, Thornton
    IN: Hall
    OUT: Ablett

    Shame about Tadgh though.
    Last edited by Matt79; 6 September 2007, 05:14 PM.
    Swannies for life!
  • hammo
    Veterans List
    • Jul 2003
    • 5554

    #2
    Buchanan misses out also.

    Am I the only one who thinks there will be some late changes on Saturday?
    "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

    Comment

    • ernie koala
      Senior Player
      • May 2007
      • 3251

      #3
      Originally posted by hammo
      Buchanan misses out also.

      Am I the only one who thinks there will be some late changes on Saturday?
      Buchanan for McVeigh.....ppplllleeeaaassseeee Mr Roos.
      Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

      Comment

      • DST
        The voice of reason!
        • Jan 2003
        • 2705

        #4
        Would be very shocked to see Buchanan not playing.

        That team seems slightly out of balance with one too many talls in the side.

        DST
        "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #5
          The team looks too defensive.
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          • nat
            On the Rookie List
            • Oct 2006
            • 501

            #6
            Originally posted by hammo
            Buchanan misses out also.

            Am I the only one who thinks there will be some late changes on Saturday?

            I hope so. I'm gonna be angry if Barlow is out there instead of Buchanan.

            Comment

            • Lucky Knickers
              Fandom of Fabulousness
              • Oct 2003
              • 4220

              #7
              Well that's the team that gelled so beautifully kicking 22 goals PLUS our nbr 1 goal kicker for Ablett.
              With Fraser back in we need another tall do we not?
              I wasn't too impressed with Buchanans form in the Rnd 21 - ok for him to miss again. Admit he wasn't alone on the night.

              Comment

              • DeadlyAkkuret
                Veterans List
                • Oct 2006
                • 4547

                #8
                Originally posted by NMWBloods
                The team looks too defensive.
                We made one change so how is that all of a sudden defensive compared to last week?

                Comment

                • Sanecow
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 6917

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                  We made one change so how is that all of a sudden defensive compared to last week?
                  Ablett >>> Hall

                  Comment

                  • alison.z
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 988

                    #10
                    i'm pretty happy - it would have been a damn hard decision!!

                    Comment

                    • alison.z
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 988

                      #11
                      Originally posted by NMWBloods
                      The team looks too defensive.
                      wouldn't we be more attacking coz we have included a forward for a midfielder/defender ?!?!

                      Comment

                      • NMWBloods
                        Taking Refuge!!
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 15819

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                        We made one change so how is that all of a sudden defensive compared to last week?
                        On a big ground against a team that has killed us in the middle the past few times we have played them, we look too defensive.
                        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                        Comment

                        • Plugger46
                          Senior Player
                          • Apr 2003
                          • 3674

                          #13
                          No Buchanan?

                          Doesn't make sense. He has an excellent finals record. Sure he turns it over a bit, but he creates too.

                          Surely no one can tell me that McVeigh gives us more?
                          Bloods

                          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                          Comment

                          • Sanecow
                            Suspended by the MRP
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 6917

                            #14
                            "Don't flirt with form except for Hall."

                            Comment

                            • Robbo
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2007
                              • 2946

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Plugger46
                              No Buchanan?

                              Doesn't make sense. He has an excellent finals record. Sure he turns it over a bit, but he creates too.

                              Surely no one can tell me that McVeigh gives us more?
                              One thing I've learnt this year is that McVeigh is undroppable.

                              Comment

                              Working...