Injuries to blame
Collapse
X
-
-
WC had worse injuries than us and did better.
Adelaide had worse injuries last year.
Who are all our injuries? Kennelly, Hall, and LRT?
Injuries are a fact of football. It's hardly the case we've been decimated by injuries. So we are now crying poor for the bad luck with injuries - I don't recall us praising the heavens for our fantastic luck with injuries in the previous 4 years.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football." -
The fact is, when players get older they are more susceptible to injury.
There is no logical reason why Hall, Barry, Crouch, Mathews etc will have a free run with injuries next year when they are all a year older and the hamstrings just a little tighter.
Throwing most of our eggs in that basket can only backfire.
Injuries to key players are always a problem but sometimes you can cover if you've blooded enough youngsters along the way. That is where we are seriously behind other teams."As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment
-
With a borderline list like the Swans (ie a list in which few of the reserves have had significant AFL game time), injuries have a bigger effect.
Silly. A good run with injuries is due to good player management, a bad run is due to luck. In fact Crouch and LRT basically spent the year recovering from the previous season.Comment
-

Comment