Schnieds, Opinion's May Change

[Triple B]

If only there was another Willo, Dyson or Maxfield up for trade!

Whilst not disagreeing with the sentiment, it must be said Dyson was nothing like Willo or Maxfield.

Schmidt's the closest thing we have to Dyson at the minute.

[Margie]

Whilst not disagreeing with the sentiment, it must be said Dyson was nothing like Willo or Maxfield.

Schmidt's the closest thing we have to Dyson at the minute.

Fair call. I think we'll see a lot more of Schmidt next year.

[Industrial Fan]

If only there was another Willo, Dyson or Maxfield up for trade! I hope Schneider remains a Swan though and turns his form around in 2008.

I heard we have some interest in Dyson...!

The goal against Banfield in 2005 from the centre bounce revived his career. If he hadn't kicked that goal he'd be gone already.

[Cheese]

Whats the point of trading him though,

what for?

L.Fisher or pick 26.

seriously his alot better than that, and did get us into the grand final.

two perfectly crumbed goals, to get us through against the AINTS.

play him where he is made to play

[dendol]

How good was Willo!

Thats what I thought as well watching that clip. We need a skillful outside midfielder big time!

[Triple B]

I heard we have some interest in Dyson...!

You'll find we are talking about the Swans Dyson, not the Bomber Dyson.

[Industrial Fan]

Sorry, I was still trying to work out why Big W hasn't got a game so far...

[barry]

I counted 1 hard ball get.

I like Schneids, but he hasnt done much since 2005 and really he's just a...
...
Soft receiver.

[connolly]

FFS - his name is Schneider!

When he starts kicking the big goals and doesn't choke I'll take the trouble to spell his name correctly. Its appropriate to apply his "can't be arsed" attitude to fitness and footy to spelling his name. The least we can do

[shaun..]

Is he enjoying his footy? He seemed quite enthusiastic in his debut year.

[goswannie14]

I counted 1 hard ball get.

I like Schneids, but he hasnt done much since 2005 and really he's just a...
...
Soft receiver.

This is the greatest load of BS that is continually gone on about on this forum. Not everyone has to be an "in and under" player. Every team needs receivers that can do something with the ball. The problem with Schneider is that his skills when disposing of the ball are less than satisfactory.