Goodes racially abused (merged thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dimelb
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    • Jun 2003
    • 6889

    #46
    Agree, floppinab - must read. Very well put together.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

    Comment

    • floppinab
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 1681

      #47
      Originally posted by Lucky Knickers
      Having now read the book chapter in full, I believe that assigning that motivation to Goodes is unfair. It's selective editing and an eye-catching beat up headline by the newspapers that give it that appearance.

      Think you are judging him unfairly floppinab.
      Then why give the year and ground???? That sentence could have quite easily been written without those details and had just the same impact. Yes there still would have been speculation but the player would have been impossible to identify. As it stands it's not that hard to narrow down who it might be.
      Last edited by floppinab; 7 March 2008, 10:11 AM.

      Comment

      • Go Swannies
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2003
        • 5697

        #48
        Originally posted by floppinab
        Then why give the year and ground???? That sentence could have quite easily been written without those details and had just the same impact. Yes there still would have been speculation but the player would have been impossible to identify. As it stands it's not that hard to narrow down who it might be.
        Without some of the specifics it would look as if Goodes was claiming "me too". But now there would be pages on BigFooty saying Goodes was big noting himself and saying he was fantasising to be compared with Nicky Winmar. Sorry, he had to give enough data to show that he remembered when and where it happened.

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #49
          Originally posted by floppinab
          Then why give the year and ground???? That sentence could have quite easily been written without those details and had just the same impact. Yes there still would have been speculation but the player would have been impossible to identify. As it stands it's not that hard to narrow down who it might be.
          It is actually hard to narrow down who it might be.

          We played what, six or seven teams at the SCG - 25 players per team ... that's over 150 players to choose from.

          Of those, you can say that at least 50 would be "high profile".

          What's the point in dragging out a "name" SIX years after the fact - considering that it was dealt with at the time and that Goodesy has moved on??

          Goodesy is indeed a gentleman for not "kissing and telling".
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • floppinab
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 1681

            #50
            Originally posted by Annie Haddad
            It is actually hard to narrow down who it might be.
            With some help I've narrowed it down already Annie, it wasn't that hard.

            Without some of the specifics it would look as if Goodes was claiming "me too". But now there would be pages on BigFooty saying Goodes was big noting himself and saying he was fantasising to be compared with Nicky Winmar. Sorry, he had to give enough data to show that he remembered when and where it happened.
            Well put GS, hadn't thought of that.

            Comment

            Working...