No worries.
We don't need Hall
Collapse
X
-
Davis is almost the obvious choice considering his 8 goal performance today, but we have so, so many options in Roosy's bag of tricks."Two cities, One team, Together, Living the Dream."Comment
-
Well, in some ways we dont need Hall, but he is our go-to man inside 50 usually. Paul Roos has got some serious thinking to do.
In my opinion i think Adam Goodes can take Barry Hall's spot. Hes tall, strong and very fast/athletic, i reckon he'd do well there. Of course theres also Nick Davis, we all know what Davo is capable of, he is a match winner, that goal against geelong 2005 left me breathless.
But yeah, i dont think we will choke without Hall. Hes gonna have to get over that wrist injusry anyway. ((Good on ya barry for showing staker who the boss is))
Geelong @ skilled stadium will be a huge test, but im confident we can make the cats squeel!!!!Comment
-
The Swans record without Hall isn't too bad. It stands at 4 wins and 4 losses, and a healthy percentage of 108.43.
Remember the 4 losses were against:
1. Brisbane at the Gabba in 2002 (Away from Home, where no one in that era won at the Gabba against the Lions/ Brisbane were then at their highest, right in the middle three straight flag run)
Adelaide at the SCG in 2002. (Sydney and Paul Roo's recent boogy team/the Crows were Preminimary Finalists that year/Swans still kicked 15 goals against 17)
West Coast at Subi in 2007 (The then reigning Premiers/the highly charged return game for Cousins(who took 41 possessions)/Only two goals the difference)
Geelong at Kardina in 2007 (Like Brisbane in 2002, one of the strongest teams in recent years/at the Cattery/Only three goals the difference, being the Cats closest win at Kardina Park all season, (althought they did lose to Port in Round 21))Comment
-
He may get let off.
Sky News says only that he "APPEARED" to punch the Eagles player.
And I don't think Staker could give evidence against him - he looked like he didn't know where he was.
OK , Sky don't want to prejudice the tribunal outcome , but this PC reporting is plain bloody silly !Comment
-
Theres a couple of negatives to this
1. Adam has never really worked as key forward (or back). So if he gets the job, he has to definitely play it as a roaming CHF. And he will definitely have to chase the likes of Scarlett when Geelong have the ball...not always Goodesy's best attribute
2. It will take away from our on-ball so we have to find a replacement there. If Goodes goes forward OKeefe could spend more time on ball. And/or Davis if he plays
I think the answer will be a rotation...Davis, Goodes, Barlow, OKeefe and try
to get match-ups against the likes of Scarlett and Harley right
The one thing I dont want to see is Scarlett vs Goodes and then having Goodes sent to Full Forward to take Scarlett out of the play. This doesnt get us any gainRed and white till I dieComment
-
Comment
-
He may get let off.
Sky News says only that he "APPEARED" to punch the Eagles player.
And I don't think Staker could give evidence against him - he looked like he didn't know where he was.
OK , Sky don't want to prejudice the tribunal outcome , but this PC reporting is plain bloody silly !Comment
Comment