How long will the tribunal suspend BBBH for?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike_B
    Peyow Peyow
    • Jan 2003
    • 6267

    How long will the tribunal suspend BBBH for?

    Now that the MRP has referred this straight to the tribunal, how long do you think they will give Baz to recover from his broken wrist?

    Gut feel says 8, hopeful they go with 6, but can't see it being any less than that.

    I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

    If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

  • Damien
    Living in 2005
    • Jan 2003
    • 3713

    #2
    I am preparing myself for 10-12 and hoping for 6-8.

    Really depends on the Tribunal's moood - who is on the Tribunal these days?

    Comment

    • ROK Lobster
      RWO Life Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 8658

      #3
      My initial reaction was 6. I think that's all it deserves but I can see a hysterical response 0f 8-10.

      Comment

      • DST
        The voice of reason!
        • Jan 2003
        • 2705

        #4
        6 to 8, which will be about what it's going to take him to get back onto the field with his wrist anyway.

        That would put him back for West Coast in round 11 or Melbourne in round 13.

        Probably wise to miss the game against West Coast anway.

        DST
        "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

        Comment

        • DST
          The voice of reason!
          • Jan 2003
          • 2705

          #5
          Originally posted by ROK Lobster
          My initial reaction was 6. I think that's all it deserves but I can see a hysterical response 0f 8-10.
          Hysterical is the media, not the three ex players sitting on the tribunal. Don't mix the two of them up.

          The formula said 4, so they will add a couple to that.

          Looking at the draw 7 would work well, as the Eagles would miss him on the return leg for round 11.

          DST
          "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

          Comment

          • CureTheSane
            Carpe Noctem
            • Jan 2003
            • 5032

            #6
            Gonna stick with 6.

            If the Swans are smart, they will say that Hall's injury is a 4 week injury.
            The AFL will want Hall to miss games while fit.
            The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

            Comment

            • goswannie14
              Leadership Group
              • Sep 2005
              • 11166

              #7
              Originally posted by ROK Lobster
              My initial reaction was 6. I think that's all it deserves but I can see a hysterical response 0f 8-10.
              yep, that's what i think too.
              Does God believe in Atheists?

              Comment

              • 573v30
                On the bandwagon...
                • Sep 2005
                • 5017

                #8
                6 weeks.

                However, the Hall-hating media will want his blood and probably force the AFL to give him 10-12 weeks.
                I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

                Comment

                • hammo
                  Veterans List
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 5554

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CureTheSane
                  Gonna stick with 6.

                  If the Swans are smart, they will say that Hall's injury is a 4 week injury.
                  The AFL will want Hall to miss games while fit.
                  Yes, I think that is why the Swans aren't talking about the length of time Hall will miss through injury anyway.

                  I can see them making an example out of him so anything up to 8 weeks wouldn't surprise. Anything over 6 is harsh in my books.
                  "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                  Comment

                  • CureTheSane
                    Carpe Noctem
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 5032

                    #10
                    To be honest, when I first saw the incident, I said "that's 4 weeks"
                    But then I got caught up with the hysteria (mainly here) and then I reassessed to 6.

                    I think we should all be prepared for up to 12 weeks.

                    Gonna have to watch the Footy Show, just to see what they do with it.
                    Any publicity......
                    Hell, Hall should be on the panel.
                    How rare is it for a Swan to be present?
                    And it's not like it will affect his match preparation.....
                    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                    Comment

                    • RED&WHITE BUNNY
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 12

                      #11
                      He should get around 8

                      Comment

                      • goswannie14
                        Leadership Group
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 11166

                        #12
                        I just saw some of the other incidents from the weekend. Given that some of these were offered 1 week, Hall should only get 3-4. If only they were consistent.
                        Does God believe in Atheists?

                        Comment

                        • elroy67
                          Parking Cars
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 419

                          #13
                          Originally posted by CureTheSane
                          Gonna have to watch the Footy Show, just to see what they do with it.

                          Given recent antics, I expect they'll have him punching on with Caro and Sam Lane.
                          We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

                          Comment

                          • 573v30
                            On the bandwagon...
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 5017

                            #14
                            I'd be extremely surprised if The Footy Show don't mock the hit.
                            I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

                            Comment

                            • shaun..
                              Stuck in Reserves
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 691

                              #15
                              WWS on Ch9 were already referring it as 'to do a Hall'
                              "In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.Roos

                              Comment

                              Working...