Kenelly: Rate yourself much?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dread and might
    Back, strapped and intact
    • Apr 2004
    • 949

    Kenelly: Rate yourself much?

    "It's a great opportunity for me to learn and play so much with the best players in the competition and learn so much from them.

    "It's picking their brains more than anything else. Andrew McLeod is a similar type of player to myself - those types of players, you just want to learn as much from them and the way they carry themselves."
    Now, I love the Irishman as much as the next person, but..... http://news.realfooty.com.au/kennell...0507-2bvy.html
    I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #2
    I read that about half an hour ago and laughed!
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • BeeEmmAre
      Commentary Team Captain
      • Aug 2005
      • 2509

      #3
      Andrew McLeod v Tadhg Kennelly.

      One is the better player, the other is their team's barometer.
      "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

      YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

      Comment

      • Chookbilly
        Sniffing out the pill
        • Mar 2007
        • 393

        #4
        I don't see the issue with the comment.

        They ARE similar players, they both play as an attacking, running half back.

        Yes McLeod is a brilliant player, but Tadgh isn't far behind, and has every right to be mentioning himself alongside.
        Ed Considine's day out - Round 3, 16th April 1995.
        11 Kicks, 13 Handballs, 8 Marks, 1 Goal, 1 Behind, 1 Tackle, 1 Hitout, 3 Brownlow votes (his only votes)
        Ed = God

        Comment

        • Mogg0
          On the Rookie List
          • Sep 2006
          • 211

          #5
          Saw that too, and guessed it would be mere hours for some clown to take it out of context and triviliase one of our great players. You came through for me, Dread.

          I don't see much of McCleod so I can't compare the two, but it's pretty obvious Tadgh was talking in terms of style, not talent.

          Ridiculous thread.
          Grandson of South Melbourne legend Keith Schaefer.

          Comment

          • Kanga
            On the Rookie List
            • Aug 2007
            • 274

            #6
            Originally posted by NMWBloods
            I read that about half an hour ago and laughed!
            Kennelly is kidding himself.

            Comment

            • royboy42
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2006
              • 2076

              #7
              Originally posted by Mogg0
              Saw that too, and guessed it would be mere hours for some clown to take it out of context and triviliase one of our great players. You came through for me, Dread.

              I don't see much of McCleod so I can't compare the two, but it's pretty obvious Tadhg was talking in terms of style, not talent.

              Ridiculous thread.
              As you said MoggO

              Comment

              • stellation
                scott names the planets
                • Sep 2003
                • 9718

                #8
                When I read the article I simply took it as Tadhg stating that he and Andrew play a similar role, which I certainly believe they do, and he is taking the opportunity to learn from him.
                I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                Comment

                • BloodNut
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 97

                  #9
                  Some people read too much into articles and thats why the media is the way it is. Nothing in it but someone has to try and rubbish a player again.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16733

                    #10
                    I'm most definitely in the "what's the problem camp?"

                    He is clearly showing deference to McLeod by stating how great it is to learn from the best. And he's no mug himself, or he wouldn't have been selected to play in this game.

                    Definitely a case of trying to pick holes in someone with no justification.

                    Comment

                    • swantastic
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 7275

                      #11
                      Originally posted by stellation
                      When I read the article I simply took it as Tadhg stating that he and Andrew play a similar role, which I certainly believe they do, and he is taking the opportunity to learn from him.
                      Spot on there Stell,and i dont know why people would rubbish Tiger when he is on song so are the Swans the same goes with McCloud and Adelaide.


                      it's pretty obvious Tadhg was talking in terms of style, not talent
                      Its wasnt just obvious it was bloody obvious,but well said Mogg0.

                      Kennelly is kidding himself.
                      Kanga you are kidding your self,Tiger isnt very far behind McCloud at all.In fact for some one who hasnt played the game for his entire life Tiger in that respect is IMHO equally as good as McCloud who has played all his life and was bought up on footy.
                      Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                      Comment

                      • NMWBloods
                        Taking Refuge!!
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 15819

                        #12
                        I think some of the responses here are being way too precious. Normally when comparing players, you compare the 'lesser' with the 'greater', not vice versa (eg: Barlow is a similar player to Goodes, rather than Goodes is a similar player to Barlow). Kennelly obviously meant absolutely nothing by it; it just sounded amusing as it was around the other way. I doubt very much the OP was a serious dig at Kennelly in any way at all.
                        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16733

                          #13
                          Originally posted by NMWBloods
                          I think some of the responses here are being way too precious. Normally when comparing players, you compare the 'lesser' with the 'greater', not vice versa (eg: Barlow is a similar player to Goodes, rather than Goodes is a similar player to Barlow). Kennelly obviously meant absolutely nothing by it; it just sounded amusing as it was around the other way. I doubt very much the OP was a serious dig at Kennelly in any way at all.
                          Or maybe the whole existence of this thread is a case of being too precious. After all, it was deemed sufficiently arrogant enough to warrant starting a thread all for the purposes of having a dig, even if it was meant half heartedly.

                          As for the ordering of the players being of any significance, absolute rubbish. Similarity is a completely symmetrical concept.

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #14
                            Originally posted by liz
                            Or maybe the whole existence of this thread is a case of being too precious. After all, it was deemed sufficiently arrogant enough to warrant starting a thread all for the purposes of having a dig, even if it was meant half heartedly.

                            As for the ordering of the players being of any significance, absolute rubbish. Similarity is a completely symmetrical concept.
                            I thought the was a giveaway that it was just a bit of fun. If it wasn't that, which I took it as, then D&M perhaps could say he was really having a dig at Kennelly.

                            As for the ordering, it's not "absolute rubbish". From my experience, people will typically say things like "Barlow is similar to Goodes" not "Goodes is similar to Barlow" - the established, longer-term player is the benchmark that the other is compared to. Yes it is a symmetrical concept (but it also has a degree of setting benchmarks), but I've seen it typically expressed the way I stated.
                            Last edited by NMWBloods; 8 May 2008, 08:00 PM.
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • RogueSwan
                              McVeigh for Brownlow
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 4602

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Mogg0
                              Saw that too, and guessed it would be mere hours for some clown to take it out of context and triviliase one of our great players. You came through for me, Dread.

                              I don't see much of McCleod so I can't compare the two, but it's pretty obvious Tadhg was talking in terms of style, not talent.

                              Ridiculous thread.
                              Originally posted by Stellation
                              When I read the article I simply took it as Tadhg stating that he and Andrew play a similar role, which I certainly believe they do, and he is taking the opportunity to learn from him.
                              Originally posted by liz
                              I'm most definitely in the "what's the problem camp?"

                              He is clearly showing deference to McLeod by stating how great it is to learn from the best. And he's no mug himself, or he wouldn't have been selected to play in this game.

                              Definitely a case of trying to pick holes in someone with no justification.
                              Agree, agree, agree.
                              "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                              Comment

                              Working...