Swans' fantastic four??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16786

    Swans' fantastic four??

    Not quite sure what Tugwell was on when she came up with this. Presumably it is not Kennelly himself who labelled them as the four "superstars".

    TADHG Kennelly says the Swans are building a bulletproof belief as they prepare to take on St Kilda tonight with their four superstar players in the lineup together for the first time this season.
    Yes, these four are very good players. Maybe better than very good, some of them. But how can you separate them from Bolton, Kirk and O'Keefe? A closer truth is that we have a core of a Magnificent Seven who we need to keep on the park and playing well if we're to challenge this year. (Plus we need Jolly to keep going too.)


    Fantastic Four back together | The Daily Telegraph
  • ROK Lobster
    RWO Life Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 8658

    #2
    Originally posted by liz
    Not quite sure what Tugwell was on when she came up with this. Presumably it is not Kennelly himself who labelled them as the four "superstars".



    Yes, these four are very good players. Maybe better than very good, some of them. But how can you separate them from Bolton, Kirk and O'Keefe? A closer truth is that we have a core of a Magnificent Seven who we need to keep on the park and playing well if we're to challenge this year. (Plus we need Jolly to keep going too.)


    Fantastic Four back together | The Daily Telegraph
    Hmmn, just looking for an angle for a story and noticed that these 4 have not played together this year? though Goodes has not been to blame (through a bit of luck). I certainly would not label Malceski a "superstar" yet. He has a nice kick and finds space and I love watching him play but he is not in that class yet.

    I think you are right Liz about the top 7 or 8, but I as ever I think it is the next 7 or 8 that we need firing to win it. Blokes like Leo, Buchanon, McVeigh, Ablett, MOL and Ted need to be playing near their best each week too.

    I am quietly confident about our prospects this year but have concerns about where we are because of our odd draw. It's not that it is an easy one,it's just difficult to get any sort of benchmark.

    PS: Tadhg did consider himself on a par with McLeod, so maybe he did say that?

    Comment

    • cruiser
      What the frack!
      • Jul 2004
      • 6114

      #3
      Originally posted by liz
      Yes, these four are very good players. Maybe better than very good, some of them. But how can you separate them from Bolton, Kirk and O'Keefe? A closer truth is that we have a core of a Magnificent Seven who we need to keep on the park and playing well if we're to challenge this year. (Plus we need Jolly to keep going too.)


      Fantastic Four back together | The Daily Telegraph
      I agree. I'd also add MOL to that list. His performance in Halls absence has been superb.
      Occupational hazards:
      I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
      - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

      Comment

      • eggbeater
        Left Right Out
        • Sep 2006
        • 229

        #4
        Originally posted by liz
        Yes, these four are very good players. Maybe better than very good, some of them. But how can you separate them from Bolton, Kirk and O'Keefe? A closer truth is that we have a core of a Magnificent Seven who we need to keep on the park and playing well if we're to challenge this year. (Plus we need Jolly to keep going too.)
        "Magnificent 7 + Jolly" has a nice ring to it doesn't it?

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16786

          #5
          Originally posted by ROK Lobster
          Hmmn, just looking for an angle for a story and noticed that these 4 have not played together this year? though Goodes has not been to blame (through a bit of luck). I certainly would not label Malceski a "superstar" yet. He has a nice kick and finds space and I love watching him play but he is not in that class yet.

          I think you are right Liz about the top 7 or 8, but I as ever I think it is the next 7 or 8 that we need firing to win it. Blokes like Leo, Buchanon, McVeigh, Ablett, MOL and Ted need to be playing near their best each week too.

          I am quietly confident about our prospects this year but have concerns about where we are because of our odd draw. It's not that it is an easy one,it's just difficult to get any sort of benchmark.

          PS: Tadhg did consider himself on a par with McLeod, so maybe he did say that?
          I'd understand it if it were just the trhee that have been missing a bit, and commenting on how good it will be to have them all. Throwing Mr" I Haven't Missed a Game for Over 200 (Though I'm a Tad Lucky to Be Playing This Weekend)" in there just confuses it.

          On whether Malceski belongs in the top 7, I have no doubt he does. To me those are our 7 AA or Dream Team Game calibre players. Don't forget that Malceski was in the AA squad of 40 last season and probably only missed the final cut by a whisker. If he'd not done a knee I have little doubt he'd have been in the Vic squad earlier this year.

          We have 3 other ex-AAs in Spida, MickyO and Leo but they're not going to get back to that level before they retire. And other than the very young players, for whom it is too early to tell, I can't see anyone else in our current team elevating themselves to that level during their careers (maybe McVeigh and MartyM are two "possibles").

          So those 7 do form a clear standout group to me.

          I agree with your point that those 7 can't do it on their own. And other players are important in their own right. But I still reckon these 7 are the key. Others could come in from outside the current 22 and make up for the absence of most of the rest but none could replace these 7 and keep the team close to its best.

          Comment

          • ugg
            Can you feel it?
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 15976

            #6
            I thought it was the Famous Five.
            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
            Reserves WIKI -
            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

            Comment

            • BeeEmmAre
              Commentary Team Captain
              • Aug 2005
              • 2509

              #7
              More like the Terrific 22
              "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

              YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

              Comment

              Working...