Hawks gambler...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain
    Captain of the Side
    • Feb 2004
    • 3602

    Hawks gambler...

    Hawthorn players owns up to gambling breach | Herald Sun

    Doesn't the AFL have to name the player?? Obviously they did with the 4 players last year, what is the difference now?
  • Industrial Fan
    Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
    • Aug 2006
    • 3318

    #2
    They shouldn't have been named last year.

    Dont think that precedent should be followed myself.
    He ate more cheese, than time allowed

    Comment

    • RogueSwan
      McVeigh for Brownlow
      • Apr 2003
      • 4602

      #3
      oooooh, imagine if it was one of their big guns, the media would go nuts!
      "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        #4
        In announcing the sanctions, Anderson said future breaches would result in more serious penalties.

        "The AFL wants everyone to be quite clear of our attitude to any further breaches of this rule," Anderson said.

        "If a player places a bet on an AFL match from today, he will face suspension."
        Weren't they supposed to face suspension after the last lot were busted??
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • Captain
          Captain of the Side
          • Feb 2004
          • 3602

          #5
          Originally posted by Annie Haddad
          Weren't they supposed to face suspension after the last lot were busted??
          Indeed they are. What will be interesting is whether the AFL accepts that it was for a relative.

          Comment

          • Lucky Knickers
            Fandom of Fabulousness
            • Oct 2003
            • 4220

            #6
            Protected species perhaps?

            Comment

            • Industrial Fan
              Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
              • Aug 2006
              • 3318

              #7
              Now named.

              I have no idea why they think that is necessary, given he was cleared.
              He ate more cheese, than time allowed

              Comment

              Working...