-
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time -
Id take Kerr only as a footballer, even the dickhead he is but it wouldnt sit that well with me either. Id take him well and truly before couso though in terms of what he could add to the team- at least he is still playing at the top level and has more time left in his career then Cousins. but if Hunter was involved, Im afraid I couldnt watch our beloved Swans again until that w**ker wasnt playing for us. He is vastly overated in my opinion, an ultimate cat and soft as hell! No thankyou!"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Of course, you're right.Let me see..... people here don't want various AFL players because of their personalities?
How funny.
Unless you actually have met and got to know the player I suppose.
Pretty shameful to label a whole football club as druggies because of a couple of instances.
The Swans will recruit players who have what the club needs.
They'll have them assessed in various ways, but if Judd was on offer, I'd be a bit pissed off if the club didn't show any interest at least.
People say that they'll walk away from the Swans if they recruit such and such player.
I'm sure that is a major deterrent for the club
If they did take him, I wouldn't walk away ... I love my footy too much for that, but I would be the president of the hate fan club.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
I wasnt commenting on him i was asking a question as i didnt have a clue when he came to the swans. Sorry Annie, a bit like jumping into a thread and commenting without reading everything people have said, but you wouldnt do that, only someone with rocks in their head would
The edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...Comment
-
Time is sometimes my enemy.I wasnt commenting on him i was asking a question as i didnt have a clue when he came to the swans. Sorry Annie, a bit like jumping into a thread and commenting without reading everything people have said, but you wouldnt do that, only someone with rocks in their head would
Believe me, IRL I offer no hesitation at all into jumping into the midlde of conversations ... it's fun!!
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
I'm shocked at all the comments - obviously an interesting proposition. However, I will point out that West Coast didn't get 2 first round draft picks for Judd & he is allot better than Kerr (and they need another forward too). Say what you like about Davis, on his day, he's a great forward (he's a bit like Kerr - not consistant). DO NOT UNDER-ESTIMATE THIS YEARS DRAFT PICKS - 2nd pick will be worth more than wat you think, especially with the concessions coming in the future.
Personally I would like to see it happen - it would give us a centre equal to any in the AFL I reckon.2005 will live forever (or until we win another premiership)
GO BLOODS!!!!!!!!Comment
-
If we wanted Davis we'd pick him up in the PSD.
Comment
-
"We talked five times. I called him twice, and he called me twice." :confused: :confused: :confused: :D
Eddie McGuireComment
-
I started this thread because I think Davis wants to leave the Swans & go to West Coast & Kerr wants to leave West Coast. Anybody going to judge Kerr as a "knob", etc. I would say to them - what was Barry Hall or Tony Lockett before Sydney. Lockett was the biggest thug in football. Which one of you will say that recruiting him was a mistake. Everything about Kerr is guesswork - also, allot of players take drugs because they can't drink-beer makes you fail skinfold tests, etc.(& that is straight from an ex-player - I won't say who). I would love Selwood but his cost would be higher than Kerrs & I'm not sure he wants to leave. Also, Kerr would improve the Swans.2005 will live forever (or until we win another premiership)
GO BLOODS!!!!!!!!Comment
-
West Coast didn't get 2 first round picks for Judd? They got one top 5 plus a player who'd been drafted at no 3 or 4 two years earlier and who hadn't had enough development time, as a tall, to significantly devalue his worth.
And yes, the number 2 pick this year may well be worth a fair bit. Problem is, the Swans won't get it. It's mathematically impossible for them to get it by being crap enough. The only way they'll get their hands on it is if they choose to trade someone like Goodes or O'Keefe to whoever does have it - most likely West Coast.Comment
-
I meant a 2nd round pick. Swans 1st pick & Davis would get Kerr for certain, but would they do it in this draft...I don't think so.2005 will live forever (or until we win another premiership)
GO BLOODS!!!!!!!!Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
At least unlike some on here we can admit it Hey
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 02:47 AM.
Comment