Speculation Only: Didak to Sydney, what do you think?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DeadlyAkkuret
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2006
    • 4547

    #16
    Originally posted by hammo
    Speculation only - the grammar on RWO is now worser than ever.
    Nothing is more annoying, except for the odd spelling nazi.

    Comment

    • Rod_
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 1179

      #17
      Hope we still have a NO DH's policy.

      Rod_

      Comment

      • NMWBloods
        Taking Refuge!!
        • Jan 2003
        • 15819

        #18
        Originally posted by connolly
        The West Coast model! Working a treat this year and into the forseeable future.
        Selective reading yet again...
        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

        Comment

        • 573v30
          On the bandwagon...
          • Sep 2005
          • 5017

          #19
          Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
          Nothing is more annoying, except for the odd spelling nazi.

          Speaking of Nazis, this is Hitler's take on the Didak/Shaw incident.

          Didak in trouble
          I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

          Comment

          • ShockOfHair
            One Man Out
            • Dec 2007
            • 3668

            #20
            If there were a Brownlow for sheer freaking stupidity Shaw and Didak would win it in a canter. No wonder their coach wrote a newspaper column today regretting that young recruits weren't IQ-tested.

            As Malthouse wrote, they got completely trolleyed and wrote off a day off their game preparation ahead of the St Kilda clash.
            Players IQ not considered: Malthouse - AFL - Fox Sports

            We don't want to recruit d-heads because they're a liability on the field as well as off.
            The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

            Comment

            • voodooguru
              Self-lubricating
              • Apr 2007
              • 421

              #21
              Cousins? No. Kerr? No. Didak? No.

              Hopefully, in 10 years our culture will still be the envy of the other clubs. Especially clubs like Drug Coast, The Underbellys and The Black and White Blottos.
              I was wrong about Gerard and his hair.

              Comment

              • Seagoon
                rover mower
                • Jul 2008
                • 86

                #22
                Originally posted by Rod_
                Hope we still have a NO DH's policy.

                Rod_
                They let me join this website so I guess the policy must have lapsed... ;-)
                Diabolical, triabolical, quadrabolical...

                Comment

                • ScottH
                  It's Goodes to cheer!!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 23665

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Seagoon
                  They let me join this website so I guess the policy must have lapsed... ;-)
                  I be very lonely here, if we had one of those policies.

                  Comment

                  • NMWBloods
                    Taking Refuge!!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15819

                    #24
                    Originally posted by 573v30
                    Speaking of Nazis, this is Hitler's take on the Didak/Shaw incident.
                    The Adelaide one is funnier IMO.
                    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                    Comment

                    • Dogzbody
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 282

                      #25
                      Given that Essendon and Port are the first clubs to show positive interest in Dids, we could look at a 3 way to try and get either Justin Westoff or that bloke that wears the orange boots (that wallsy hates).

                      Win win situation, they give away their high draft picks, we get a forward player that looks the goods, and has been tested at AFL level.

                      In return we give away???? Idea gone
                      "We talked five times. I called him twice, and he called me twice." :confused: :confused: :confused: :D

                      Eddie McGuire

                      Comment

                      • i'm-uninformed2
                        Reefer Madness
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 4653

                        #26
                        The Cuz, Kerr, Didactic . . . get em all here. Then we'd get some coverage in the Sydney papers and by christ, RWO would really light up too.

                        What's the downside?
                        'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                        Comment

                        • 573v30
                          On the bandwagon...
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 5017

                          #27
                          Originally posted by NMWBloods
                          The Adelaide one is funnier IMO.
                          There's also a Hawthorn and SEN version, someone should make a Swans version.
                          I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

                          Comment

                          • swantastic
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 7275

                            #28
                            Originally posted by ScottH
                            I be very lonely here, if we had one of those policies.
                            Why?..You wouldnt be allowed on here either...LOL
                            Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                            Comment

                            • Primmy
                              Proud Tragic Swan
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 5970

                              #29
                              You know for a minute or two I thought my fellow RWOs were taking that question seriously, but I can now relax. NO.
                              If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                              Comment

                              • Darren Thomson
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 291

                                #30
                                Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                                The Cuz, Kerr, Didactic . . . get em all here. Then we'd get some coverage in the Sydney papers and by christ, RWO would really light up too.

                                What's the downside?
                                Dk too old, BC too much trouble AND too old and AD, well, our supporters have teeth, how could we support him? No lets stick with our earliest possible draft pick this year, I hear it's a good draft, lots of ready made players. We might well be a good reform school, but enough is enough


                                Paul Roos for PM

                                Comment

                                Working...