Tonight's Umpiring
Collapse
X
-
I don't think Geelong needed much help to be honest.
That said, I thought the umpiring was very poor. As I've noticed in many of the Geelong games I've watched this year they seem to get a very good run with the umpires and are marked on a different set of rules to the opposition. It's almost as if the umpires are in awe of them.
They seem to pay a free for the sake of it to Geelong.
All that said the frees didn't decide the game.Comment
-
I know the Cats are fantastic and all that, however the key decisions that put us behind the Eight Ball were poor...wrong decisions.
It's been a while since I've wanted to explode over the Umps but it was amateurish at best and sordid at worst.
The 50 was angried up the blood and the HTB was frustrating for ALL.
The crucial times at which the UMPS cruelled us was match turning.
I was proud of the boys, their effort deserved better from the officials.The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of DisappointmentComment
-
They wanted to have an impact on the game and did. At times I wish they would just put the whistle in the pocket. I had an alternative location, however I applied self sensorship.
Even if I do take off my Red and white sunglasses, being one eyed.
The frees in the first quarter ruined what could have been a good game. Long way back into a game like this after umpire free goals .... It is nearly cheating IMO.
We need to get a better umpire's liasion officer. Attempt to find out how we can improve our free count "for and against" A break even would be good.
Could be worth the 20K and do a James Hird didn't he get a record number of frees after complaining a few years ago?
At times I was wondering if the rules had changed? Seemed we should have received a couple of frees and it went the other way....
Poor game by the umpires and I hope that miss the grand finals as a result!
Rod_Comment
-
i have been saying this for a couple of years now but the reaction of officialdom to our winning style in 2005 was to encourage play on and discourage players holding the ball and creating "ugly stoppages". the result has been an encouragement of players releasing/throwing the ball to the vicinity of team mates. this has been evident for a couple of years so that a spillage is less likely to be penalised than a player holding the ballComment
-
i have been saying this for a couple of years now but the reaction of officialdom to our winning style in 2005 was to encourage play on and discourage players holding the ball and creating "ugly stoppages". the result has been an encouragement of players releasing/throwing the ball to the vicinity of team mates. this has been evident for a couple of years so that a spillage is less likely to be penalised than a player holding the ballBevo bandwagon driverComment
-
Those cardboard loudspeakers certainly came in handy when screaming "@@@@-ing useless maggot" every five seconds.
I think the game would be a much better game if there were no maggots at all.
Men in the white coats behind the goals only.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
Ablett's kick looked like a goal.
I actually think the umpiring in the first quarter got us into the game - the crowd got vocal and the team lifted.
It was bad, and the Cats certainly needed no help to dispatch with us.He ate more cheese, than time allowedComment
-
The umpiring was an absolute disgrace. Most on this thread are being gracious and saying that it didn't affect the result, but when 5 of the first 7 goals were from frees, who's to say it didn't? We fought back brilliantly in the 1st quarter and were still 3 goals down thanks to the men in yellow. The mate I was with made the call that the umpires, especially Kennedy, were star struck by Geelong and I think he was spot on. It was game over after all those early frees, with the 50M being the worst of them.Today's a draft of your epitaphComment
-
Comment
-
The problem on saturday night appeared to be that the umpires made different decisions for different teams.
It was okay for Geelong to hold on, take players out and get tackled with having had opportunity... but not for the Swans.
I can accept umpiring when it is bad but consistent. I cannot accept it when it is bad and inconsistent to one team.Comment
-
The problem on saturday night appeared to be that the umpires made different decisions for different teams.
It was okay for Geelong to hold on, take players out and get tackled with having had opportunity... but not for the Swans.
I can accept umpiring when it is bad but consistent. I cannot accept it when it is bad and inconsistent to one team.Comment
-
I have said enuf about the appalling umpiring in other threads. Just disgraceful, one sided inconsistent rubbish. Still, not much hope of beating the Cats, but we did a better job than most
Paul Roos for PMComment
Comment