Finals Umpires

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    #31
    Originally posted by connolly
    Nico i think that there is a real risk that Chamberlain will play really technical frees in the first quarter. The side that leads to the ball will have a better chance of avoiding a mounting free kick count, particularly in the first quarter. Chamberlain umpires by paying very technical free kicks early to establish a control. He is an umpire that has no "feel"for the game, lacks judgment and is over emotional.
    Another great pre-game call connolly.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #32
      Originally posted by Triple B
      In spite of him, not because of him.
      The frees ended up 20-20.
      I reckon North won the early frees, but we managed to peg them back in the 2nd half.
      Be interesting to see a breakdown of who paid who the frees.

      Comment

      • dimelb
        pr. dim-melb; m not f
        • Jun 2003
        • 6889

        #33
        Originally posted by ScottH
        The frees ended up 20-20.
        I reckon North won the early frees, but we managed to peg them back in the 2nd half.
        Be interesting to see a breakdown of who paid who the frees.
        Interesting that we pegged them back when we were generally getting to the ball first and using it creatively.
        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #34
          Originally posted by dimelb
          Interesting that we pegged them back when we were generally getting to the ball first and using it creatively.
          Funny how that sort of thing works out, isn't it!!

          Comment

          • giant
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2005
            • 4731

            #35
            3 comments:

            1. We probably did Ok out of the umpires, especially in the second half
            2. The umpiring generally over the weekend was a quantum leap from the H&A standard
            3. The field umps looked like superstars compared to the goal umps..

            Comment

            • Glenn
              ROLLLLLL TIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!
              • Mar 2003
              • 2443

              #36
              Still the holding the ball non calls were laughable, if you are tackled and drop the ball then that is holding the ball (not that it was paid on Sat night)
              Premiers 09,18,33,05

              "You Irish Twit", Quote attributed to a RWO member who shall remain nameless.

              Comment

              • Primmy
                Proud Tragic Swan
                • Apr 2008
                • 5970

                #37
                Originally posted by Xie Shan
                Nobody loves Raymond?

                (Sorry!)
                No. We call him Napoleon. Little Big Man Syndrome.
                If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                Comment

                • Jewels
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3258

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Glenn
                  Still the holding the ball non calls were laughable, if you are tackled and drop the ball then that is holding the ball (not that it was paid on Sat night)
                  It is NEVER paid anymore, it has been frustrating the hell out of me for weeks now. I can't remember the last time I saw a free paid for dropping the ball.

                  Comment

                  • shaun..
                    Stuck in Reserves
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 691

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Glenn
                    Still the holding the ball non calls were laughable, if you are tackled and drop the ball then that is holding the ball (not that it was paid on Sat night)
                    Yep, more blatant than dragging the ball in! It really is poor umpiring.

                    I'd be surprised if Chamberlain gave a FF to the Swans that night
                    "In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.Roos

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Glenn
                      Still the holding the ball non calls were laughable, if you are tackled and drop the ball then that is holding the ball (not that it was paid on Sat night)
                      Is that "improper release of the ball"? Happens a lot and it's a real lottery whether the player gets pinged or not. Gablett is a master at it, so is Leon Davis. If someone holds a mark for the time they have the ball, it usually gets paid, but not when the shoe's on the other foot (so to speak).
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • shaun..
                        Stuck in Reserves
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 691

                        #41
                        Originally posted by dimelb
                        Is that "improper release of the ball"? Happens a lot and it's a real lottery whether the player gets pinged or not. Gablett is a master at it, so is Leon Davis. If someone holds a mark for the time they have the ball, it usually gets paid, but not when the shoe's on the other foot (so to speak).
                        I'm also noticing alot of players just purposely dropping the ball, as if to throw it ahead of them..or was that what you were referring to (Re:Gablett)?
                        "In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.Roos

                        Comment

                        • reigning premier
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 4335

                          #42
                          Umpiring has NEVER changed the result of a game....

                          It's entirely up to the team on the field.

                          The better team will win, it always does. Stop whining and making excuses.

                          Comment

                          • Missy
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 445

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Primmy
                            No. We call him Napoleon. Little Big Man Syndrome.

                            We were on the boundary in Bay 121 and he made quite a few bad calls right in front of us to which we screamed "Back to oompa loompa land for you Ray!"

                            Comment

                            • dimelb
                              pr. dim-melb; m not f
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 6889

                              #44
                              Originally posted by shaun..
                              I'm also noticing alot of players just purposely dropping the ball, as if to throw it ahead of them..or was that what you were referring to (Re:Gablett)?
                              With him I was thinking of the way he releases the ball at times when he is tackled, but does it in such a way that it's as if he hasn't actually held it. I think that is improper release of the ball.
                              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                              Comment

                              • dimelb
                                pr. dim-melb; m not f
                                • Jun 2003
                                • 6889

                                #45
                                Originally posted by reigning premier
                                Umpiring has NEVER changed the result of a game....

                                It's entirely up to the team on the field.

                                The better team will win, it always does. Stop whining and making excuses.
                                Whining? Rather I'm thinking of the way we may be perceived as a team that kills the ball, and as a result get pinged where others can play on. I don't think umpires go out of their way to give frees against us. On the other hand, as I pointed out elsewhere (umps thread), when we are first to the ball and use it to advantage, the frees seem to favour us as happened on Saturday night.
                                He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                                Comment

                                Working...