Ch 10 Coverage of Swans Vs Roos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CureTheSane
    Carpe Noctem
    • Jan 2003
    • 5032

    Ch 10 Coverage of Swans Vs Roos

    Completely sucked.

    Very rare for me to give a crap about good/bad coverage comments as it never really worries me that much.

    But tonight it was really really bad.
    How many replays are they gonna show while the game is going on?
    How many times are they gonna use a camera on the boundary only to have a blue or red jumper get in the way?
    And that AFL swirly logo at the end of every replay uses up a ridiculous amount of game time.
    Add poor camera work - missing the play and it was pretty frustrating to watch.
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #2
    The replays annoyed me while play was going on. But that was evened up by not having to listen to McAvaney because it was on 10. I'll take that any time.
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #3
      And I don't want to see the coaches, or the crowd every few minutes.

      Comment

      • goswannie14
        Leadership Group
        • Sep 2005
        • 11166

        #4
        Some of the reactions of Roos were funny to see.
        Does God believe in Atheists?

        Comment

        • bloods2005
          On the Rookie List
          • Apr 2008
          • 91

          #5
          come on... it wasnt that bad

          Comment

          • 573v30
            On the bandwagon...
            • Sep 2005
            • 5017

            #6
            Originally posted by bloods2005
            come on... it wasnt that bad
            Apart from Walls and Lane.
            I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

            Comment

            • chalbilto
              Senior Player
              • Oct 2007
              • 1139

              #7
              Lane really sucks.

              Comment

              • 573v30
                On the bandwagon...
                • Sep 2005
                • 5017

                #8
                At least we didn't have to put up with Blighty and his "back in my days..." comments.
                I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

                Comment

                • dimelb
                  pr. dim-melb; m not f
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 6889

                  #9
                  And again "action close-ups" instead of looking at the field.
                  He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                  Comment

                  • Melbournehammer
                    Senior Player
                    • May 2007
                    • 1815

                    #10
                    lane needs to have a good look at himself and have a listen to his commentary and its anti-swans pattern - he still has not gottn over barry hall getting to play in 2005

                    Comment

                    • satchmopugdog
                      Bandicoots ears
                      • Apr 2004
                      • 3691

                      #11
                      How pissed off would the AFL bewith the stuff up at the beginning!!!!! How amateurish. Flying thatbloke around the country so he can introduce the National Anthem and he didn't get to say his words. What a waste of airfares!!!!
                      "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                      Comment

                      • dendol
                        fat-arsed midfielder
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 1483

                        #12
                        Originally posted by goswannie14
                        The replays annoyed me while play was going on. But that was evened up by not having to listen to McAvaney because it was on 10. I'll take that any time.
                        agree, mcavaney-isms are the most annoying thing in sports commentary at the moment.

                        Comment

                        • Matty10
                          Senior Player
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 1331

                          #13
                          The coverage was very badly produced tonight - especially the replays - the number of times that passages of play were missed was ridiculous.

                          Plus they don't even watch their own coverage - they kept saying the goal umpire didn't signal that the ball hit the post (which he did) even though it was captured on their footage. I can understand the callers missing it while watching the play, but surely someone in their production team was watching what they produced?

                          Comment

                          • Xie Shan
                            Senior Player
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 2929

                            #14
                            Originally posted by dendol
                            agree, mcavaney-isms are the most annoying thing in sports commentary at the moment.
                            I think Bruce is still a very good play-by-play caller of the game (as is Commetti), his McAvaney-isms are a bit hit and miss, but infinitely preferable to listening to Lane and Walls in the same commentary box IMO. (Another bonus of being at the game! )

                            Comment

                            • Lucky Knickers
                              Fandom of Fabulousness
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 4220

                              #15
                              I am going to defend Ch10 - at least Quarters and Lane call the actual play. I've been pleasantly surprised.
                              I get totally annoyed when it becomes a chat-fest.

                              Comment

                              Working...