If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes, we're doing the whole team. There are people out there who watch the ressies and like to rate them.
Rate away ...
39
10
0%
0
9
0%
0
8
0%
0
7
0%
0
6
0%
2
5
0%
11
4
0%
8
3
0%
6
2
0%
6
1
0%
6
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun. Blessedare the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
5 when he is in i think he shows some good signs, he has not been given the chances of say a bevan who i would rate a similar player in terms of ability.
^ Ignores obvious line about that being tough on Brennan.
He's only ever going to be a fill-in when injuries cut people down; there are just too many flaws in his game. Whether they keep him around as a backup seems unlikely. For a season rating, maybe a 4.
He has talent, and you can see why he was a top 10 draft pick and why the Swans gave him a second chance. Physical, good contested mark and good reader of the play. However, his horrible kicking action is a big liability at either end of the ground and is probably 5 cm too short to play as a key defender.
He has talent, and you can see why he was a top 10 draft pick
For real Ugg? If you were to be considered a top 10 draft pick you'd expect them to be able to kick the ball properly. Brennan certainly doesn't fit the bill.
He's a trier i'll give him that but he just doesn't have the skills/nouce to have any real role around the ground to be worth persisting with IMO.
2/10 because he managed to snag a couple of games but will be delisted at the end of the year IMO.
Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
For real Ugg? If you were to be considered a top 10 draft pick you'd expect them to be able to kick the ball properly. Brennan certainly doesn't fit the bill.
He's a trier i'll give him that but he just doesn't have the skills/nouce to have any real role around the ground to be worth persisting with IMO.
2/10 because he managed to snag a couple of games but will be delisted at the end of the year IMO.
Yes, but for his kicking he would be a solid player. He's solidly built and is not afraid to get stuck in.
As for the stats I don't believe that stats always tell the whole story but if you want to go ahead and put them in, please - don't be shy!!
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun. Blessedare the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
3/10 + 1 for that bag of 9 in the Ressies.
I like Luke. Not only is he a great singer he is bloody fearless at the contest and I like that.
I hope they keep him on the list. Aside from being a bit injury prone, his terrible kicking hasn't lead to anything awful happening when he's played seniors - and his hardness has worked in our favour - caused a turnover or taken out an opposition player along with himself
I like Luke, and rekon he gets harshly treated.
If he got a fair dinkum crack at it with injuries and game time he can make it.
Granted his kicking is is downfall and it will never improve .
I hope he gets another year though his spot is one they will look at.
Comment