If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
OK, that's sort of deviating from my original point. Basically, O'Keefe was out of contract, which lowers his trade value straight away. The Swans could have just cut their losses and accepted whatever Hawthorn were offering. Nobody would see it as caving in. It's just being practical. They didn't do that, which means that either Roos is proud, or has very good reason to believe O'Keefe would re-sign rather than go into the PSD.
So - assuming ROK was happy to go to the Hawks - if they'd offered a straight swap of ROK for Tim Clark, you think we should have accepted?
(BTW - O"Farrell was out of contract too when the Hawks nabbed him).
Tweet
Comment