AFL's Revamped Drug Rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnnieH
    RWOs Black Sheep
    • Aug 2006
    • 11332

    AFL's Revamped Drug Rules

    They should be retrospective.

    Tough anti-drug rule wont derail disgraced ex-west coke budgie fallen star cousins' comeback


    AFL boss Andrew Demetriou said on Monday that a team could have a win taken away from it if there was evidence that one player who had played a significant role in that game had tested positive to drugs on match day.
    What is a "significant" role. How many touches do you think you have to have before your game is considered "significant".

    Idiots and their idiot loopholes.

    Discuss.
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
  • sidswan
    Warming the Bench
    • Oct 2007
    • 206

    #2
    What nonsense...so if a player has a positive match day test, but only played an 'insignificant role' ...no action will be taken?...Truly Pathetic

    Comment

    • 573v30
      On the bandwagon...
      • Sep 2005
      • 5017

      #3
      Well, it's opposite when players get into serious off-field incidents: the hacks are delisted but the stars are protected.
      I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

      Comment

      Working...