AFL rule schanges survey.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166
    #1

    AFL rule schanges survey.

    Have your say.

    League calls for fans' say on rushed behinds
    Does God believe in Atheists?
    Tags: afl, rule, schanges, survey, Swans, sydney
    • 573v30
      On the bandwagon...
      • Sep 2005
      • 5017
      #2
      What are the chances Vlad and Co. are going to read these responses?
      I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

        Comment

        • laughingnome
          Amateur Statsman
          • Jul 2006
          • 1624
          #3
          One can only hope they listen to Paul Roos if not to us.
          10100111001 ;-)

            Comment

            • AnnieH
              RWOs Black Sheep
              • Aug 2006
              • 11332
              #4
              Free kick for misconduct
              Proposal discussed: introduce a ?misconduct? free kick for incidents such as squirting the contents of drink bottles in the face of opponents, throwing objects during play (e.g. mud, mouth guards, other players boots) and/or for unnecessarily interfering with an opponent (e.g. pulling opposition player?s shorts down). At present a player can be reported for misconduct but a free kick cannot be awarded.
              How friggin soft do they want this game to be?

              I hope they listen to the little people!

              Roosey's say ...

              Hold fire on rushed behinds: Roos
              Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
              Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                Comment

                • goswannie14
                  Leadership Group
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 11166
                  #5
                  On acouple of the questions about the NAB Cup games I answered "I don't care it's only a practice match".
                  Does God believe in Atheists?

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889
                      #6
                      Originally posted by AnnieH
                      Roosey's say ...

                      Hold fire on rushed behinds: Roos
                      The voice of common sense, certainly on this topic.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                        Comment

                        • Dunger
                          Mudlark
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 122
                          #7
                          RUSHED BEHINDS 2007-08 08 AVG 07 AVG
                          Behinds 18.9 19.4
                          Rushed behinds 6.0 5.7
                          Deliberate rushed 2.4 2.0
                          That's 1.2 deliberate rushed behinds per team per game. You would think it was 12 the way some people are carrying on.

                          Most of the rule changes in that survey are alarmist and reactionary.

                          The interchange rule is stupid. How they're told to interchange is the problem, more rules won't improve the process.

                          The only rules I thought made sense were the score line being behind the goals and the team that has posession of the ball when a stretcher is on the field retains posession after the stretcher leaves.

                          I also like the idea of the boundary throw ins being 10m inside the boundary.

                          Leave the rule fiddling to the NAB cup and introduce a cap on how many rules can be changed per season.

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...