Membership Prices

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnnieH
    RWOs Black Sheep
    • Aug 2006
    • 11332

    Originally posted by AussieAnge
    So why the panic? Perhaps the reason they haven't sent out the glossy prospectus whoops sorry membership brochure is that they have automatically renewed yours. They obviously know they had better not mess with your seats

    BTW I reckon they've put the prices up to pay for that brochure, it was a bit more professionally put together than previous seasons
    You better believe they'd better not mess with my seats.

    I've engraved my name into them!!

    The panic part is the bit where I don't want my Smart Pay payments to start when they didn't need to.
    Last edited by AnnieH; 17 November 2008, 02:22 PM.
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      Originally posted by Glenn
      Trumper Stand is a reserved area option (Mostly Gold, with some bays towards the wing Platinum).

      Got my membership book today, and looking at $300 or $385 upgrade to the Premiership Club. (Is the Premiership "gift", plus guarenteed GF tickets if the Swans make it wrth the extra $85???)
      Nah, it'll be something incredibly handy like a tacky small cheap plastic taiwan-made transistor radio that doesn't work.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • noelo
        On the Rookie List
        • Nov 2008
        • 1

        Greedy swans

        I'm very disappointed with my club. Maybe they stop reading the papers after the grand final. Because if they had been reading them they would have noticed that the world's financial markets have been imploding and with them people's life savings.

        There is good chance that a lot of people aren't going to have jobs or if they still have one, they'll be earning a lot less money. Because that's what usually happens after a financial crash. Ordinary people bear the brunt and get shafted.

        In this context I think it is out of order for the swans to keep cranking up the price of memberships as if nothing has happened. When I joined up for the first time I got great seats because there were hardly any members. Now I'm expected to pay $920 for two seats. This has been going on for a few years - playing on the loyalty of the ordinary punters. Up until now I've just gritted my teeth and forked out the money.

        But not this year. I feel gutted by it but I'm probably going to give up those seats. I think that big hike this year is just unconscionable.

        Comment

        • laughingnome
          Amateur Statsman
          • Jul 2006
          • 1624

          Yay double posts.

          My pack came today, and I had a good looksie. As a concession, my ticket price has gone up $70, nearly 50%, from $150 to $220 for the pleasure to sit on the concourse in bays 29 - 33 (Gold). We were already going to move due to the Interchange Bench relocation, but hopefully not too far. But this is not what I came to say...

          My Mum's pack stated that if she were to renew the same membership it would cost her $740. This was due in large part to the match day parking she got last year at Sydney Boys High. The way I see it, if she got the Gold ticket and Premiership Club - total $465 - it means that parking is valued at $275. Quite a ridiculous price to ask for 11 days use.

          So I guess it's worth checking before ticking the "renew as same" box, because this new "fairer" system still has a few kinks in it.
          10100111001 ;-)

          Comment

          • rwgirl
            Pushing for Selection
            • Sep 2006
            • 59

            I also got a "mistake" in the price quoted...I had a family red zone with 4 kids and was "invoiced" $1000 - instead of $675 -they'd updated one child to concession, and charged me for 2 additional children (even though 4 are included in membership).

            Call to membership advised me not to worry, they'd fix it....I've got a name in case the wrong monthly payments come out!!
            Last edited by rwgirl; 17 November 2008, 10:35 PM. Reason: typo

            Comment

            • givekidsakick
              On the Rookie List
              • Apr 2008
              • 178

              13 year veteran drops out...

              Just spoke to my Kiwi rugby convert who I took to the GF in 1996 and he has decided to drop his family membership and stay at home and watch it on the tele. He says he earns good money but feels its now a rip off and he is not willing to fork out $920 for 2 seats let alone pay for his kids. That makes it only 4 membership (maybe 3) out of 11 that we started with who may remain. How many more will be lost to the game????????

              Comment

              • iigrover
                Warming the Bench
                • Sep 2005
                • 245

                Im still yet to receive my glossy expensive membership pack. However, three of the five mates I sit with have.

                Two who have received their packs have decided that the price hike is far too much and they decided not to renew. They other guy who has received his pack is still working out whether he is willing to pay the massive price increase or drop his season ticket and watch the games on telly.

                hmmmm....

                Perhaps it would be a good time for the club to implement the earlier suggestion of bringing back the season ticket option.

                Comment

                • undy
                  Fatal error: Allowed memo
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 1231

                  Originally posted by liz
                  At this stage, it means that the Swans' perception of the price-sensitivity of their members is different to some RWOers' perception of the price-sensitvity, based on a small sample.

                  It is entirely possible that they are quite confident they have a handle on it, and are prepared to lose a few members (or alternatively offer those members a shift to cheaper seats) because they believe most in the platinum seats will renew, whether happily or not, will generate more revenue in the process, and that they will be better able to offer premium packages to potential members who want to sit in the vacated premium seats.

                  Who knows whose perception is right. The club will, no doubt, find out in due course.
                  There were some prices in that rather long and odd survey that the Swans did at the end of the season. I think I ignored them as they were all a ridiculous amount higher than the existing pricing. I wonder if the Swans are using this as a basis for their decision making.

                  My group, who have just gone "platinum", is biting the bullet (with gritted teeth - its tricky), paying up and trying to move to decent seats at Homebush. Recommendations in the platinum area there for 3 kids and 5 adults gratefully accepted. In exchange I can let you know where there are some gold seats with great access but restricted visibility.
                  Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

                  Comment

                  • SwansFan1972
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 621

                    I would love the season ticket option to be reinstated, but unfortunately I think it would be like unscrambling an egg. AND, if they found a way to do it, I reckon there might suddenly be a whole lot more members who would shift to that option - not exactly what the bean counters would have had in mind!

                    Comment

                    • AnnieH
                      RWOs Black Sheep
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 11332

                      IMHO, I'm pretty sure that decisions like these are not made in the two weeks leading up to the mass mail-out. The decision to raise/lower prices was probably made in around March this year (i.e. way before the "financial crisis" hit - if it really has).

                      I FINALLY got my pack today and renewed (for free). Had I not got the free membership this year, I STILL would have renewed my same package ... I think the swans are really counting on people like me to do the same.

                      I know the guy who sits next to me (a Richmond supporter) will not be renewing (leaving me to take his membership as well, hopefully) ... the cost is a minor issues (as we only had a minor price increase) - he's going because his new girlfriend doesn't understand the concept of wanting to go to the footy every week. Sheesh, you'd think he would have picked a more suitable chick!!!

                      I think the swans will lose the "members" who are actually fans of other clubs (ex-pats), but need a footy fix so they join the "local" team.

                      They could lose a lot of these people to the Blacktown Bogans.
                      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                      Comment

                      • Triple B
                        Formerly 'BBB'
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 6999

                        Just got the members email from the club 10 mins ago.

                        It is the longest email they've ever sent explaining the why's and how's of the new pricing structure.

                        It also mentions the club will be posting a loss for the year ending Oct '08.

                        It won't appease anybody who is upset over the changes however.
                        Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                        Comment

                        • pinkemu
                          Silver member, not Gold
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 419

                          Originally posted by Triple B
                          Just got the members email from the club 10 mins ago.

                          It is the longest email they've ever sent explaining the why's and how's of the new pricing structure.

                          It also mentions the club will be posting a loss for the year ending Oct '08.

                          It won't appease anybody who is upset over the changes however.
                          I wonder what they will be posting for the year ending Oct 09

                          Comment

                          • pinkemu
                            Silver member, not Gold
                            • Sep 2006
                            • 419

                            Originally posted by givekidsakick
                            Have a look Daily Tell-a-lie P.112 Saturday (today) story by Amy Dale that "sydneysiders" are getting a good deal on their memberships quoting NRL, Waratahs and SWANS.(Story on site page as well).The main story says that memberships are being kept at 2008 levels and says that one NRL club has dropped membership from $195 to $95. The story implies the SWANS are keeping at 2008 levels. Could someone with better computer skills find and post the story here. Expose the lie!
                            For those who missed the article, this is the lead in paragraph that makes our new memberships sound like a bargain to be had. It is the only time the Swans are mentioned.

                            "SYDNEYSIDERS may be feeling the pinch because of the global economic turmoil but at least NSW footy codes are cutting fans a break."
                            "A survey of NRL clubs, the Waratahs and the Swans has revealed the overwhelming majority of clubs are keeping their 2009 season-ticket prices at 2008 levels".

                            That survey must have come from the same place that surveyed us,
                            Planet Pulltheotherone.

                            Cutting fans a break my a@@

                            I guess the Swans could be the not so overwhelming club from the survey

                            Another paragraph
                            "Fan surveys clearly indicated the cost of attending games is a major concern. We have acted on that feedback and structured our prices accordingly," Bulldogs CEO Todd Greenberg said.

                            Now that's a CEO

                            Comment

                            • swan_song
                              I'm SO over the swans!
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 981

                              It is with great sadness, that after 20 consecutive years of following the Swans as members, that we (4 adults, 1 concession) will be watching them on the box in season 2009. The reasons being numerous, but here are a few 1. Howard and Costello's 7 consecutive interest rate rises, have meant that mortgage payments increased by some $7,000 in that time, and although rates are coming down, that money has been "lost" and needs to be recovered somehow. 2. The Swans in our opinion treat their fans badly. Not us, but the kids. For instance, how often do other clubs' players greet their fans around the boundary line after a game rather than saunter round the cricket pitch waving. 3. I don't think the players gave us value last year or the year before, putting in some very ordinary performances indeed. 4. We don't like the fact that Schneider and Dempster were traded away, and that Nick Davis was pilloried, AND that the best we could come up with at trade time this year was to get Grease Shaw. 5. The actual cost of going to the football is becoming too expensive, let alone the cost of seating. Why does it cost $15 to park on a bit of scrappy ground outside the SCG, when parking 30m from the entrance gates at the MCG on GF day cost $8; why is the Record so expensive. What will it cost in 2009?
                              I could go on, but I guess you get the picture. In a nutshell it's become too expensive as a day's outing, and the players' performances have not justified that expense in our book. With that, I feel I should also resign from RWOL...
                              but damn it, it's the Swans, and Colless's/MBH's pleading email has got me all weepy again for those damn Swans...where's the bloody cheque book?
                              "Davis...Davis has kicked 2...he snaps from 40...dont tell me, dont tell me, hes kicked a goal....unbelievable stuff from Nick Davis, can you believe this, he's kicked 3 final quarter goals and Swans are within 3 points..."

                              Comment

                              • BSA5
                                Senior Player
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 2522

                                Originally posted by pinkemu
                                For those who missed the article, this is the lead in paragraph that makes our new memberships sound like a bargain to be had. It is the only time the Swans are mentioned.

                                "SYDNEYSIDERS may be feeling the pinch because of the global economic turmoil but at least NSW footy codes are cutting fans a break."
                                "A survey of NRL clubs, the Waratahs and the Swans has revealed the overwhelming majority of clubs are keeping their 2009 season-ticket prices at 2008 levels".

                                That survey must have come from the same place that surveyed us,
                                Planet Pulltheotherone.

                                Cutting fans a break my a@@

                                I guess the Swans could be the not so overwhelming club from the survey

                                Another paragraph
                                "Fan surveys clearly indicated the cost of attending games is a major concern. We have acted on that feedback and structured our prices accordingly," Bulldogs CEO Todd Greenberg said.

                                Now that's a CEO
                                Just going off those quoted sections (haven't read the full article, so if that contradicts me, let me know), it does say "NSW codes", not "NSW clubs". That indicates that Union and League clubs are keeping prices low, not the Swans. Now, I know including the Swans when referring to the survey suggests that the Swans are included in this, but it does not explicitly state that. It could be meant as a comparison to the union and league clubs that are keeping prices down. It's quite poorly worded either way.
                                Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                                Comment

                                Working...