Western Sydney team to be delayed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wardy
    The old Boiler!
    • Sep 2003
    • 6676

    Western Sydney team to be delayed

    Ok so I saw the headline flying accross the bottom of the TV screen on the 5.30am news this morning - but I didnt stick around to watch the entire bulletin - anyway, if reports are true, the AFL have decided to delay putting a new team into Western Sydney due to lack of interest!!! hmm perhaps Andy and the lads read RWO keen to see what happens now to the new facilities out at Blacktown!.
    I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
    Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
    AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!
  • Jeffers1984
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4564

    #2
    Should be delayed for another 15-20 years.
    Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

    Comment

    • Cheer Squad
      Sydney Swans
      • Apr 2007
      • 1948

      #3
      Here's the story...

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        #4
        Well Theo Dimwit, if you are reading this ... Tassie.
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • goswannie14
          Leadership Group
          • Sep 2005
          • 11166

          #5
          Originally posted by AnnieH
          Well Theo Dimwit, if you are reading this ... Tassie.
          Was thinking the same thing, bring on Tassie.
          Does God believe in Atheists?

          Comment

          • Wardy
            The old Boiler!
            • Sep 2003
            • 6676

            #6
            Originally posted by goswannie14
            Was thinking the same thing, bring on Tassie.
            yeah its not rocket science is it!!! Tassie makes sense and the crowds will go no matter where it is on the island. But Vlad thinks he knows best - he is an idiot!
            I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
            Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
            AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              #7
              Originally posted by AnnieH
              Well Theo Dimwit, if you are reading this ... Tassie.
              Hear, hear.
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • 573v30
                On the bandwagon...
                • Sep 2005
                • 5017

                #8
                How long did it take them to realise there would be little interest?

                Bring on the Tassies!
                I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

                Comment

                • ShockOfHair
                  One Man Out
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 3668

                  #9
                  There won't be a Tassie team. At least, not until a Melbourne team agrees to go into exile. It's ridiculous that a national competition has nine teams from one city, but none of them look like falling at the moment. With a bit of luck the recession will drive one of them to the wall.

                  Tassie deserves a team, and would certainly send more than 19,000 people to a final, but it's not worth the AFL's effort.

                  Western Sydney has six or seven times the population of Tasmania, virtually no AFL facilities and little interest in the game. So, the league has to make that its focus. It's a marketing imperative, nothing to do with football. I know it's a crapulous way of looking at the game, but that's modern sport.

                  Anyway, it's good news they've put back the western Sydney timetable indefinitely. 2012 was way too early. 2017 might be a better bet.

                  The biggest implication of today's news on actual football is - someone gets a bye every week.
                  The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                  Comment

                  • ScottH
                    It's Goodes to cheer!!
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 23665

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AnnieH
                    Well Theo Dimwit, if you are reading this ... Tassie.
                    They'll have to restrict the family ticket though.

                    Comment

                    • hammo
                      Veterans List
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 5554

                      #11
                      The message from this is that there will be no 18th team in the current economic environment.

                      There are some serious implications for all 16 existing clubs, but particularly the Melbourne ones and those already struggling financially:

                      * Corporate sponsorship will be wound back. In Melbourne, all 9 clubs will be competing for a smaller pie.

                      * Club memberships will fall off. Households will be looking to cut their spending and for many football memberships will be what goes (particularly if your club has no prospect of playing finals).

                      * The next TV deal could be signifcantly less than the current one meaning less money for all clubs. All media companies are under pressure. A post-Packer 9 will not have the money to conduct a bidding war for AFL rights (they also just paid for the Olympics), so it points to 7 and 10 getting the rights again for a bargain price.

                      Some Melbourne clubs must be very nervous to see where this all ends up - Melbourne FC in particular. Football is not immune from economic downturns and while the AFL competition has socialist ideals, the AFL as a body is basically a commercial beast and will let a club die / relocate / merge if it ultimately leads to a healthier competition. We're more likely to see a return to 16 teams rather than an 18th team which is probably what the AFL wants.
                      "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                      Comment

                      • Cheer Squad
                        Sydney Swans
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 1948

                        #12
                        Originally posted by hammo
                        ... the AFL as a body is basically a commercial beast and will let a club die / relocate / merge if it ultimately leads to a healthier competition. We're more likely to see a return to 16 teams rather than an 18th team which is probably what the AFL wants.
                        Precisely what they tried to do to North Melbourne a couple of years ago. You're probably right about a likely return to 16 teams in the short-to-medium term.

                        Comment

                        • goswannie14
                          Leadership Group
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 11166

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Cheer Squad
                          Precisely what they tried to do to North Melbourne a couple of years ago. You're probably right about a likely return to 16 teams in the short-to-medium term.
                          I've said it before, I believe that within 5 years North Melbourne will have merged with the new GC team. Bingo, 16 teams again. Then they just need to get one to relocate to Western Sydney and one to Tassie.
                          Does God believe in Atheists?

                          Comment

                          • Cheer Squad
                            Sydney Swans
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 1948

                            #14
                            Originally posted by goswannie14
                            I've said it before, I believe that within 5 years North Melbourne will have merged with the new GC team. Bingo, 16 teams again. Then they just need to get one to relocate to Western Sydney and one to Tassie.
                            It becomes a question of which teams would be best suited to relocation.

                            Being a Sydney person, I think - at the moment - the only Melbourne-based club that could relocate to western Sydney and make a go of it would be Collingwood. The club has the same outlook generally as western Sydney, and playing at Homebush certainly holds no fears for them. If not Collingwood, who else? Maybe the Bulldogs?

                            I've always thought that if Richmond relocated to Tasmania, the Tassie Tigers would certainly have a ring to it. They'd probably become one of the most popular brands in the AFL.

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Cheer Squad
                              It becomes a question of which teams would be best suited to relocation.

                              Being a Sydney person, I think - at the moment - the only Melbourne-based club that could relocate to western Sydney and make a go of it would be Collingwood. The club has the same outlook generally as western Sydney, and playing at Homebush certainly holds no fears for them. If not Collingwood, who else? Maybe the Bulldogs?

                              I've always thought that if Richmond relocated to Tasmania, the Tassie Tigers would certainly have a ring to it. They'd probably become one of the most popular brands in the AFL.
                              I always thought the Western Bulldogs would be a perfect fit for Western Sydney, don't even have to change the name.

                              I had thought that about Richmond, but I think they are financially stable at the moment. I also thought Melbourne could go to Tassie, "Demons" could be changed to "Devils", and you have the Tassie Devils.
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              Working...