State of the list Clarified
Collapse
X
-
If Pyke really is an 'off-list' rookie, that means that with the 2 additional rookie allowances for GC17 this year, Sydney could (should) take a grand total 50 person list into 2009!
Contrast this with North Melbourne who, on the bones of their arse just a couple of years ago, could I think only afford 1 rookie, so would've had a 40-odd person list.
That's some difference.Comment
-
"The Bevanator".Then again, the Swans have quite a reputation for utilising the rookie list, more so than most other clubs. Getting put on the rookie list of another club tends to mean that it's a long shot that you'll get your chance to play senior footy. At the Swans, it's probably more like 50/50. Philips, Brennan, Jack, Smith, O'Dwyer, Grundy, Barlow, and I'm sure there are others I've missed. Hell, even Kirk was rookie listed, but that's going back a fair way. We have a pretty good strike rate with rookies in terms of getting them games, as Roos has shown himself willing to put his faith in them.Comment
-
Someone's done it...here.....http://http://www.news.com.au/herald...-19742,00.html and the swans are very clearly NOT the top rookie churning club. That would (I think) be West Coast or Melbourne (esp if you include the couple of melbourne rookies now at other clubs....Aaron Davey, James MacDonald, Darren Jolly even Russell Robertson FFS!"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment

) had the time to do a study of the rookie list history of each club.
Comment