State of the list Clarified

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BSA5
    Senior Player
    • Feb 2008
    • 2522

    #16
    Originally posted by ugg
    I'm not entirely convinced. I believe we perceive the Swans to be better utilisers of the rookie list because:

    1. We are more intimately acquainted with the Swans rookie players and their successes/failures.
    2. With the exception of Brisbane, we have a larger rookie list than the rest of the clubs, meaning that on an absolute scale we could have had more rookie listers play but probably on par on a percentage basis.

    Perhaps if someone (hint hint ) had the time to do a study of the rookie list history of each club.
    Yeah, that could well be it, but I've read articles and heard interviews that have praised the Swans success with the rookie list. I'm pretty sure commentators have mentioned it as well, at times.
    Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

    Comment

    • Triple B
      Formerly 'BBB'
      • Feb 2003
      • 6999

      #17
      Originally posted by sharp9
      ...Carlton (taking Paul Johnson from Melbourne)
      Chris
      Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

      Comment

      • SimonH
        Salt future's rising
        • Aug 2004
        • 1647

        #18
        If Pyke really is an 'off-list' rookie, that means that with the 2 additional rookie allowances for GC17 this year, Sydney could (should) take a grand total 50 person list into 2009!

        Contrast this with North Melbourne who, on the bones of their arse just a couple of years ago, could I think only afford 1 rookie, so would've had a 40-odd person list.

        That's some difference.

        Comment

        • Nico
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 11337

          #19
          Originally posted by BSA5
          Then again, the Swans have quite a reputation for utilising the rookie list, more so than most other clubs. Getting put on the rookie list of another club tends to mean that it's a long shot that you'll get your chance to play senior footy. At the Swans, it's probably more like 50/50. Philips, Brennan, Jack, Smith, O'Dwyer, Grundy, Barlow, and I'm sure there are others I've missed. Hell, even Kirk was rookie listed, but that's going back a fair way. We have a pretty good strike rate with rookies in terms of getting them games, as Roos has shown himself willing to put his faith in them.
          "The Bevanator".
          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

          Comment

          • robamiee
            Regular in the Side
            • Sep 2005
            • 688

            #20
            is there anyone we can put on the rookie list to make space... nudge nudge

            Comment

            • Cardinal
              Regular in the Side
              • Sep 2008
              • 932

              #21
              I can easily think of one very arguably long-term mentally damaged player

              Comment

              • sharp9
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2003
                • 2508

                #22
                Originally posted by robamiee
                is there anyone we can put on the rookie list to make space... nudge nudge
                Someone's done it...here.....http://http://www.news.com.au/herald...-19742,00.html and the swans are very clearly NOT the top rookie churning club. That would (I think) be West Coast or Melbourne (esp if you include the couple of melbourne rookies now at other clubs....Aaron Davey, James MacDonald, Darren Jolly even Russell Robertson FFS!
                "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

                Comment

                Working...