Player Ratings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kangle4
    Warming the Bench
    • May 2003
    • 200

    Player Ratings

    i was rating each player on the list out of 100 and was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on what i've done so far and on the ones i haven't done yet. thanks.

    PLAYERS

    GOODES 95
    BUCHANAN 77
    HALL 90
    KIRK 92
    MEREDITH
    HEATH 53
    BIRD 77
    C. BOLTON 91
    CURRIE
    HANNEBERY 56
    D. O'KEEFE 62
    JOLLY 88
    BARLOW 70
    GRUNDY 71
    PLAYFAIR 74
    CROUCH 73
    MCVEIGH 87
    MOORE 78
    WHITE 68
    J. BOLTON 84
    JACK 77
    BARRY 84
    JOHNSTON 61
    ROBERTS-THOMSON 76
    ABLETT 76
    MATTNER 84
    LAIDLAW 58
    O'DWYER 66
    O'LOUGHLIN 82
    FOSDIKE 74
    MALCESKI 81
    SMITH 64
    VESZPREMI 77
    BEVAN 77
    BRABAZON 62
    R. O'KEEFE 91
    KANNELLY 88
    RICHARDS 78
    SCHMIDT 71

    ROOKIES

    THORNTON
    MURPHY
    ORREAL
    GILCHRIST 57
    PYKE
    CONEY
  • ROK Lobster
    RWO Life Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 8658

    #2
    Why?

    Comment

    • Legs Akimbo
      Grand Poobah
      • Apr 2005
      • 2809

      #3
      Originally posted by ROK Lobster
      Why?
      68
      He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.

      Comment

      • kangle4
        Warming the Bench
        • May 2003
        • 200

        #4
        for a game i am a part of, i am working on the sydney list

        Comment

        • eggbeater
          Left Right Out
          • Sep 2006
          • 229

          #5
          would help if u let us know how you're rating these players.

          Comment

          • kangle4
            Warming the Bench
            • May 2003
            • 200

            #6
            i am rating the players in a number of different attributes but the ones I have put up are there overall rating in their best position.

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16769

              #7
              Originally posted by kangle4
              i am rating the players in a number of different attributes but the ones I have put up are there overall rating in their best position.
              It is just a list of numbers, though. They could pretty much be random numbers. Without some sense of the formulae and/or criteria you've used to arrive at those numbers, how can anyone comment?

              And why use a rating scale of 0-100 if the newest players added, who've shown nothing, all warrant a figure higher than 50?

              Comment

              • connolly
                Registered User
                • Aug 2005
                • 2461

                #8
                Originally posted by kangle4
                i was rating each player on the list out of 100 and was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on what i've done so far and on the ones i haven't done yet. thanks.

                PLAYERS

                GILCHRIST 57
                Bit harsh there sport, Gillie was one of the best keeper/bastmen in the history of the game. I take it that your ranking methodology is so subjective that you have expansively included cricket in the forensic equation. Keep thinking outside the centre square.
                Bevo bandwagon driver

                Comment

                • ROK Lobster
                  RWO Life Member
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 8658

                  #9
                  Originally posted by liz
                  And why use a rating scale of 0-100 if the newest players added, who've shown nothing, all warrant a figure higher than 50?
                  That's easy - you are born at 0. If they could not get at least 50, they would never get picked up in the first place.

                  Comment

                  • Dalai Lama
                    Suspended by the MRP
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 632

                    #10
                    rank

                    69 is good ying yang allegedly?

                    Comment

                    • jono2707
                      Goes up to 11
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 3326

                      #11
                      Thats Numberwang!

                      Comment

                      Working...