I realise that is a bit simplistic but the last few games (exclude the poor final) against the doggies they have shot a lot straighter than us.
16.9 (106) 2008 (MCG) 9.11 (69)
25 scoring shots to 20
17.9 (113) 2008 (Manuka Oval) 14.13 (97)
26 scoring shots to 27
18.2 (112) 2008 (SCG) 14.10 (94)
20 scoring shots to 24
8.5 (57) 2007 (Manuka Oval) 15.10 (100)
13 scoring shots to 25 woohoo!
So are we not going through the corridor against the Dogs? Are we afraid of their rebound that much that we play too wide and end up taking shots from the pocket?
Are we then getting hurt down the middle because if/when we turn it over, the Dogs have a clear run down the middle and can shoot for goal from better angles?
I can't remember the games to answer my questions that is why I am putting it to the collective RWO memory.
I realise that 18.2 is ridiculous and won't get repeated for a long time (at least against us).
16.9 (106) 2008 (MCG) 9.11 (69)
25 scoring shots to 20
17.9 (113) 2008 (Manuka Oval) 14.13 (97)
26 scoring shots to 27
18.2 (112) 2008 (SCG) 14.10 (94)
20 scoring shots to 24
8.5 (57) 2007 (Manuka Oval) 15.10 (100)
13 scoring shots to 25 woohoo!
So are we not going through the corridor against the Dogs? Are we afraid of their rebound that much that we play too wide and end up taking shots from the pocket?
Are we then getting hurt down the middle because if/when we turn it over, the Dogs have a clear run down the middle and can shoot for goal from better angles?
I can't remember the games to answer my questions that is why I am putting it to the collective RWO memory.
I realise that 18.2 is ridiculous and won't get repeated for a long time (at least against us).

Comment