Let's see what the consensus is.....
Should he stay or should he go - the poll
Collapse
X
-
Should he stay or should he go - the poll
85The club should sack him, or he should retire0%26I dunno, I've been away, what did he do this time?0%1He can play as long as he wants0%58The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Tags: None -
Needs to be a 4th option. They're all too black and white, while I think he should stay I wouldn't say for "as long as he wants". -
Agree. Whilst he's been a moron, we have no ready made replacement. And with MOL going at the end of the year. 2010, could be a long year without him.Comment
-
Comment
-
Brett Kirk is one of my most admired players of all time. Big Bad Blind Barry let him down yet again on Saturday.
For a club with a no dickheads policy, it would be wrong to keep him, he has to go. Absolute moron of a man.
He has served the club well but enough is enough he has to be shown the door. Time to move on.Comment
-
Brett Kirk is one of my most admired players of all time. Big Bad Blind Barry let him down yet again on Saturday.
For a club with a no dickheads policy, it would be wrong to keep him, he has to go. Absolute moron of a man.
He has served the club well but enough is enough he has to be shown the door. Time to move on.Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
The competition has changed since Jack Dyer was playing buddy. The way Barry Hall behaves is not acceptable.
I agree the game has gone soft, we can sit here and whinge about it all night, but the fact of the matter is that you can't behave like Hall does.
I've had enough. And judging by Kirk's comments yesterday, it sounds like he has too.Comment
-
Stay. I'm guessing he's going to pull his head in a bit from here on in.The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.Comment
-
Stay!Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yep right. A convicted criminal who bashed an opponent breaking his jaw behind the play is a rated the best player of the 20th Century, a Hall of Famer and allowed to peddle his trade in the sport, a "recovering" drug addict is playing on and its a competition of divers (Lloyd), nigglers (just about every opponent of Hall's who have been sent out by mug coaches such as Malthouse and Clarkson to deliberately incite Hall into a misdeamenor) and cheap shot merchants (Mooney). Hall is neither a diver, niggler, cheap shot merchant, inciter of violence nor a convicted criminal but is apparently not allowed to continue his profession despite already being punished by the disciplinary body of the code. The calls for him to be rubbed out of the sport come not from battered or aggreived opponents but from within his own club. Does this not seem bizarrely unfair? And if the game is supposedly against on field violence why is it still regarded as acceptable for clubs to deliberately employ tactics to incite and provoke an opponent to violence? Fair play?Bevo bandwagon driverComment
Comment