Don't agree at all with that statement.
The decision to keep both DOK and Laidlaw will be vastly differrent to de-listing both MOD and Brabazon.
Both MOD and Braba have been relatively injury free in the reserves and have been given ample time to show whether they can play at senior level. In both cases their decision making and disposal probably means they will not be retained (although it's line ball for Braba and will depend on retirements).
In the case of both DOK and Laidlaw, they have not been able to play regulalrly due to injury but both have shown enough promise (DOK only of late) that with further football and less injuries they can make it at senior level.
With the way our list is at present and under the likelyhood that we will have atleast 7 spots to fill even without de-listing someone, any young player who has shown ability to play at senior level but for injury is going to be retained.
DST
The decision to keep both DOK and Laidlaw will be vastly differrent to de-listing both MOD and Brabazon.
Both MOD and Braba have been relatively injury free in the reserves and have been given ample time to show whether they can play at senior level. In both cases their decision making and disposal probably means they will not be retained (although it's line ball for Braba and will depend on retirements).
In the case of both DOK and Laidlaw, they have not been able to play regulalrly due to injury but both have shown enough promise (DOK only of late) that with further football and less injuries they can make it at senior level.
With the way our list is at present and under the likelyhood that we will have atleast 7 spots to fill even without de-listing someone, any young player who has shown ability to play at senior level but for injury is going to be retained.
DST

...For a club that is looking to rebuild...? Extremely puzzling to say the least.
I only support one team: The
Comment