Teddy on the trading table

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cheer Squad
    Sydney Swans
    • Apr 2007
    • 1948

    Teddy on the trading table

    With so many retirements being announced, and a general clean-out of our list imminent, I think there might be some value to the club in putting Ted Richards on the trading table.

    Let's be honest - Ted hasn't exactly set the world on fire for some time, and our backline has functioned quite well in his absence. We haven't missed him. I think we could extract the most value from him as part of a trade for another, younger player, with better long-term prospects.

    Ted will be 27 next season, and if we hang on to him for too long, he'll just end up getting delisted. Let's trade him while he still has some reasonable market value.
  • hammo
    Veterans List
    • Jul 2003
    • 5554

    #2
    Ted would be worth a third round pick at best so I honestly can't see it happening.

    I'm predicting a very quiet trade week for the Swans.
    "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

    Comment

    • DST
      The voice of reason!
      • Jan 2003
      • 2705

      #3
      Way more value to our team as the third tall defender or swingman than what he would be worth on the open market (probably a third round pick at best).

      Where do some of you get these ideas from?

      With Fosdike, Hall, Magic, Leo, Crouch, possibly Playfair and Kennelly as well off the list at the end of the year we are around the departures we want to lose this year.

      I can see the club now making only one more cut and that is likely to be Brabazon as 7 or 8 will be the maximum in what will be a thin draft this year.

      DST
      Last edited by DST; 20 August 2009, 08:59 PM.
      "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

      Comment

      • thejones,s
        On the Rookie List
        • Feb 2008
        • 308

        #4
        Originally posted by Cheer Squad
        With so many retirements being announced, and a general clean-out of our list imminent, I think there might be some value to the club in putting Ted Richards on the trading table.

        Let's be honest - Ted hasn't exactly set the world on fire for some time, and our backline has functioned quite well in his absence. We haven't missed him. I think we could extract the most value from him as part of a trade for another, younger player, with better long-term prospects.

        Ted will be 27 next season, and if we hang on to him for too long, he'll just end up getting delisted. Let's trade him while he still has some reasonable market value.
        What are you smoking..trade teddy what a joke..lets lose all our experience and beat GC to all the good pics in 2010

        Comment

        • Midfield
          On the Rookie List
          • Apr 2009
          • 196

          #5
          Ted stays. He's a blood.

          Comment

          • Cheer Squad
            Sydney Swans
            • Apr 2007
            • 1948

            #6
            Originally posted by DST
            Way more value to our team as the third tall defender or swingman than what he would be worth on the open market (probably a third round pick at best).

            Where do some of you get these ideas from?

            With Fosdike, Hall, Magic, Leo, Crouch, possibly Playfair and Kennelly as well off the list at the end of the year we are around the departures we want to lose this year.

            I can see the club now making only one more cut and that is likely to be Brabazon as 7 or 8 will be the maximum in what will be a thin draft this year.

            DST
            We haven't missed him since he got injured in the Carlton game. And our form since his departure has been very good.

            Ted has been making quite a few costly mistakes for a while now. It's only in his absence that it's become apparent how costly.

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16736

              #7
              Roos has said we'll be looking to bolster KPP stocks. Admittedly that's with half an eye to the future, but we currently have close to no depth in tall defenders, and with just Murphy untried. Mattner has been played more in the midfield in recent weeks, with promising results. Can't see why on earth we'd want to lose such a solid citizen in Ted, who still has four or five good years ahead of him.

              Comment

              • Cheer Squad
                Sydney Swans
                • Apr 2007
                • 1948

                #8
                Originally posted by liz
                Roos has said we'll be looking to bolster KPP stocks. Admittedly that's with half an eye to the future, but we currently have close to no depth in tall defenders, and with just Murphy untried. Mattner has been played more in the midfield in recent weeks, with promising results. Can't see why on earth we'd want to lose such a solid citizen in Ted, who still has four or five good years ahead of him.
                Because he still has value as a tradable player. If we're serious about bolstering our KPPs, who else do we have that we'd be happy to trade?

                Comment

                • DST
                  The voice of reason!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 2705

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Cheer Squad
                  Because he still has value as a tradable player. If we're serious about bolstering our KPPs, who else do we have that we'd be happy to trade?
                  Who says?

                  We couldn't move ROK for a first round pick in a decent draft last year.

                  We are unlikely to get anything more than a late third round pick for Ted this year in a draft where everybody is going to hold this year. Which based on what he brings to this team right now is not an adequate trade in my opinion.

                  DST
                  "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                  Comment

                  • Bloody Hell
                    Senior Player
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 3085

                    #10
                    Ted is a good player. Much more valuable to us than anything we'd get for him...no idea why you'd want to trade him.
                    The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                    Comment

                    • BSA5
                      Senior Player
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 2522

                      #11
                      Only if we were to pick up Lake. Otherwise, he stays. Would accept no less than a second rounder for him.
                      Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                      Comment

                      • Cheer Squad
                        Sydney Swans
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 1948

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Bloody Hell
                        Ted is a good player. Much more valuable to us than anything we'd get for him...no idea why you'd want to trade him.
                        Precisely! You'd trade him while he still has some currency. He's probably the only experienced player on our list we'd be willing to part with in exchange for someone with greater potential.

                        Comment

                        • Primmy
                          Proud Tragic Swan
                          • Apr 2008
                          • 5970

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Midfield
                          Ted stays. He's a blood.
                          Amen to that.
                          If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                          Comment

                          • DeadlyAkkuret
                            Veterans List
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 4547

                            #14
                            What a joke. We couldn't get a can of beans for Ryan but some people on here will only settle for a 2nd rounder for Ted.

                            *Wake up!















                            *1st & 2nd rounder possible if we deal with Fremantle.

                            Comment

                            • hammo
                              Veterans List
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 5554

                              #15
                              Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                              What a joke. We couldn't get a can of beans for Ryan but some people on here will only settle for a 2nd rounder for Ted.

                              Wake up!
                              Yep. The silly season has started early
                              "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                              Comment

                              Working...